
Central Connecticut
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.6%Central Connecticut
82.4%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -9.4
PROJECTED TOTAL139.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -468

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 65
Projected Total139.4
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index53.7
111.4Offensive Efficiency106.4
107.0Defensive Efficiency103.2
4.4Net Efficiency3.2
-7.7Strength of Schedule0.7
-0.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
66.3Tempo64.4
54.0%Effective FG%49.3%
15.9%Turnover Rate14.8%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
31.3%Free Throw Rate39.5%
2.9Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–44.4), defensive efficiency (103.2–107.0), strength of schedule (0.7–-7.7), recent form (12.9–-0.5).
Central Connecticut COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.4–106.4), net efficiency (4.4–3.2), shooting efficiency (54.0–49.3).