UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.4%UAB

75.6%SMU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSMU -7.7

PROJECTED TOTAL161.4

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -310

SMU

20-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 77

Projected Total161.4

Projected ScoreSMU 85

Team Comparison

UABMetricSMU

56.9MMH Power Index62.5

110.5Offensive Efficiency118.2

102.9Defensive Efficiency109.6

7.6Net Efficiency8.6

0.4Strength of Schedule7.0

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3

71.7Tempo71.1

48.8%Effective FG%55.7%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.7%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

36.9%Free Throw Rate31.3%

5.4Average Margin6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–56.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–110.5), net efficiency (8.6–7.6), strength of schedule (7.0–0.4).

UAB COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–109.6), recent form (2.9–-1.3), ball security (12.4–15.7).

Final

UAB

69—72

SMU

SMU by 3 • 64.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATSMU

27-56FG28-64

48.0%FG%44.0%

6-193PT5-23

32.0%3PT%22.0%

9-11FT11-17

82.0%FT%65.0%

35Rebounds35

11Offensive Rebounds15

21Assists19

15Turnovers7

3Steals12

8Blocks8

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Butta Johnson	G	36	8-12	2-5	2-3	3	2	0	1	20
Christian Coleman	G	19	5-8	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	1	10
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	27	3-8	0-1	3-4	13	3	0	3	9
Javian Davis	Forward	34	3-5	0-0	2-2	3	1	0	1	8
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	28	2-7	2-4	2-2	3	3	2	1	8
Eric Gaines	Guard	31	3-10	0-5	0-0	4	10	1	1	6
Tony Toney	Guard	11	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	14	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Samuell Williamson	Forward	32	7-12	0-1	0-0	6	2	2	1	14
Zhuric Phelps	Guard	32	4-10	1-4	5-7	3	5	1	0	14
Chuck Harris	Guard	31	5-14	2-7	2-2	3	5	2	0	14
Ricardo Wright	Guard	19	4-10	2-8	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Tyreek Smith	Not Available	26	3-6	0-0	2-4	1	1	2	5	8
B.J. Edwards	G	16	2-2	0-0	2-2	3	3	1	0	6
Keon Ambrose-Hylton	Forward	14	1-2	0-0	0-2	5	1	2	2	2
Jalen Smith	G	13	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Ja'Heim Hudson	Forward	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Emory Lanier	Guard	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.7Possessions64.7

106.6Offensive Efficiency111.3

111.3Defensive Efficiency106.6

-4.6Net Efficiency4.6

53.6%Effective FG%47.7%

56.3%True Shooting %49.9%

23.0%Turnover Rate10.9%

19.6%Free Throw Rate26.6%

33.9%3-Point Rate35.9%

1.40Assist / Turnover2.71

Game Summary

SMU won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 64.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.