Louisville logo

Louisville

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
76.0%Louisville
24.0%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL155.5
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -317
Syracuse logo

Syracuse

15-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisville 81
Projected Total155.5
Projected ScoreSyracuse 74

Team Comparison

67.1MMH Power Index52.2
118.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.2Defensive Efficiency106.6
16.4Net Efficiency2.6
6.0Strength of Schedule5.6
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
71.0Tempo69.0
56.9%Effective FG%52.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate36.2%
11.7Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Louisville HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–52.2), offensive efficiency (118.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (102.2–106.6), net efficiency (16.4–2.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–16.8), free throw rate (36.2–34.1).
Final
Louisville logo
Louisville
92—94
Syracuse logo
Syracuse
Syracuse by 2 • 74.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LouisvilleTEAM STATSyracuse
35-65FG31-51
54.0%FG%61.0%
11-253PT10-22
44.0%3PT%45.0%
11-15FT22-33
73.0%FT%67.0%
40Rebounds21
14Offensive Rebounds2
15Assists20
17Turnovers10
6Steals11
2Blocks7
20Fouls13

Player Box Score

Louisville
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Skyy ClarkG318-144-83-315300023
Brandon Huntley-HatfieldForward377-133-42-2131010019
Tre WhiteG378-120-21-1122010017
Mike JamesG304-82-32-230000012
Ty-Laur JohnsonG213-61-22-33610009
Curtis Williams Jr.G263-91-61-22020008
Kaleb GlennF162-30-00-03100004
Zan PayneGuard20-00-00-21000000
Syracuse
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chris BellF3311-158-100-061010030
Judah MintzGuard306-120-29-1524200021
J.J. StarlingG406-132-95-502100019
Maliq BrownF384-40-03-495560011
Quadir CopelandG303-60-15-927300011
Justin TaylorG241-10-00-01100002
Peter CareyCenter50-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.9Possessions74.9
122.8Offensive Efficiency125.5
125.5Defensive Efficiency122.8
-2.7Net Efficiency2.7
62.3%Effective FG%70.6%
63.8%True Shooting %70.5%
22.6%Turnover Rate13.4%
23.1%Free Throw Rate64.7%
38.5%3-Point Rate43.1%
0.88Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
Syracuse won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 74.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.