Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.4%Bucknell
94.6%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -20.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -1752
Navy logo

Navy

26-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 60
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreNavy 81

Team Comparison

35.7MMH Power Index56.8
99.5Offensive Efficiency113.2
112.8Defensive Efficiency97.6
-13.3Net Efficiency15.6
2.0Strength of Schedule-8.1
-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
67.7Tempo65.9
48.4%Effective FG%53.7%
19.0%Turnover Rate17.1%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
30.7%Free Throw Rate40.9%
-8.9Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (113.2–99.5), defensive efficiency (97.6–112.8), net efficiency (15.6–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-8.1).
Final
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
80—67
Navy logo
Navy
Bucknell by 13 • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BucknellTEAM STATNavy
30-49FG28-63
61.0%FG%44.0%
11-213PT5-21
52.0%3PT%24.0%
9-14FT6-12
64.0%FT%50.0%
27Rebounds32
4Offensive Rebounds13
20Assists16
17Turnovers13
7Steals6
5Blocks3
15Fouls18

Player Box Score

Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jack ForrestGuard406-142-54-444100018
Noah WilliamsonC218-91-20-091010017
Elvin Edmonds IVGuard385-93-51-2412300014
Ruot BijiekF294-72-41-240200011
Josh AdohGuard162-32-21-21010007
Quin BergerG121-11-12-20000005
Brandon McCreeshG142-20-00-01100004
Ian MottaF161-30-20-01101002
Pip AjayiForward141-10-00-23103002
Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin BenigniG316-133-53-532000018
Mitch FischerForward268-120-31-171000017
Donovan DraperF325-130-20-282210010
Nyles HowardG263-62-40-02101008
Austin IngeGuard272-80-22-40310006
Mac MacDonaldGuard302-70-50-01320004
Mike WoodsF212-40-00-07401004
Cam ColeG50-00-00-01010000
Aidan KehoeC20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7
116.4Offensive Efficiency97.5
97.5Defensive Efficiency116.4
18.9Net Efficiency-18.9
72.4%Effective FG%48.4%
71.9%True Shooting %48.8%
24.8%Turnover Rate18.9%
28.6%Free Throw Rate19.0%
42.9%3-Point Rate33.3%
1.18Assist / Turnover1.23
Game Summary
Bucknell won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.