
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
80.7%SMU
19.3%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL158.5
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -418

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 83
Projected Total158.5
Projected ScoreRice 75
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index45.1
118.2Offensive Efficiency108.3
109.6Defensive Efficiency109.2
8.6Net Efficiency-0.9
7.0Strength of Schedule-2.2
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
71.1Tempo68.3
55.7%Effective FG%49.7%
15.7%Turnover Rate17.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
31.3%Free Throw Rate34.7%
6.1Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–45.1), offensive efficiency (118.2–108.3), net efficiency (8.6–-0.9), strength of schedule (7.0–-2.2).
Rice COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.2–109.6), offensive rebounding (35.7–35.0), free throw rate (34.7–31.3).