
UCLA
24-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.9%UCLA
52.1%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL150.2
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -109

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 75
Projected Total150.2
Projected ScoreStanford 76
Team Comparison
63MMH Power Index59.2
115.9Offensive Efficiency111.6
106.9Defensive Efficiency107.1
9.0Net Efficiency4.5
5.1Strength of Schedule5.2
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
66.5Tempo68.1
53.5%Effective FG%51.9%
13.4%Turnover Rate15.5%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
33.8%Free Throw Rate37.2%
6.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–59.2), offensive efficiency (115.9–111.6), defensive efficiency (106.9–107.1), net efficiency (9.0–4.5).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–5.1), offensive rebounding (32.4–30.7), free throw rate (37.2–33.8).