Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.7%Texas A&M
60.3%Missouri
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMissouri -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL158.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMissouri -152
Missouri logo

Missouri

20-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78
Projected Total158.1
Projected ScoreMissouri 81

Team Comparison

58MMH Power Index57.2
116.1Offensive Efficiency115.1
108.4Defensive Efficiency109.7
7.7Net Efficiency5.4
4.8Strength of Schedule5.0
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
69.1Tempo68.8
53.5%Effective FG%55.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %34.8%
37.5%Free Throw Rate43.1%
5.3Average Margin3.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–57.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.1), defensive efficiency (108.4–109.7), net efficiency (7.7–5.4).
Missouri COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.0–4.8), recent form (-5.2–-7.2), shooting efficiency (55.2–53.5).
Final
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
79—60
Missouri logo
Missouri
Texas A&M by 19 • 62.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATMissouri
30-63FG22-48
48.0%FG%46.0%
4-173PT7-20
24.0%3PT%35.0%
15-19FT9-13
79.0%FT%69.0%
40Rebounds22
16Offensive Rebounds5
11Assists11
7Turnovers12
8Steals5
3Blocks6
16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyrece RadfordGuard338-151-25-640000022
Wade Taylor IVGuard337-161-53-353400018
Jace CarterNot Available313-62-44-552200012
Henry Coleman IIIForward204-60-00-15110008
Andersson GarciaForward332-30-03-416512007
Solomon WashingtonF182-50-10-01000004
Hayden HefnerGuard162-50-30-01000004
Wildens LevequeForward71-10-00-01001002
Eli LawrenceGuard21-20-10-00000002
Manny ObasekiGuard50-30-00-00000000
Jaelyn LeeG20-10-10-00000000
Missouri
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tamar BatesGuard397-152-54-433000020
Nick HonorGuard398-163-80-012110019
Noah CarterForward334-61-32-342020011
Curt LewisG272-41-10-10210005
Mabor MajakCenter131-10-01-12000003
Anthony Robinson IIG100-30-22-20010002
Aidan ShawF190-00-00-27120000
Jordan ButlerF170-30-10-02103000
Connor VanoverCenter30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

62.1Possessions62.1
127.2Offensive Efficiency96.6
96.6Defensive Efficiency127.2
30.6Net Efficiency-30.6
50.8%Effective FG%53.1%
54.8%True Shooting %55.4%
11.1%Turnover Rate19.6%
30.2%Free Throw Rate27.1%
27.0%3-Point Rate41.7%
1.57Assist / Turnover0.92
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 62.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.