Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

78.3%Hofstra

21.7%Hampton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL141.4

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -361

Hampton

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 74

Projected Total141.4

Projected ScoreHampton 67

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricHampton

59.3MMH Power Index43.2

114.0Offensive Efficiency104.3

100.9Defensive Efficiency105.6

13.1Net Efficiency-1.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.7

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.1

66.2Tempo67.0

52.2%Effective FG%47.3%

16.1%Turnover Rate16.7%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.3%

32.0%Free Throw Rate39.3%

8.7Average Margin-0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–43.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–104.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.6), net efficiency (13.1–-1.3).

Hampton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.9), free throw rate (39.3–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

63—59

Hampton

Hofstra by 4 • 62.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATHampton

26-57FG24-58

46.0%FG%41.0%

5-213PT6-21

24.0%3PT%29.0%

6-9FT5-6

67.0%FT%83.0%

31Rebounds35

8Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists11

9Turnovers12

7Steals2

6Blocks2

12Fouls11

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Thomas	Not Available	40	11-21	4-9	2-2	4	2	0	0	28
Darlinstone Dubar	Guard	37	7-13	0-4	2-2	4	2	1	2	16
Jacco Fritz	Forward	24	4-6	0-0	1-2	8	2	0	0	9
Silas Sunday	F	14	2-7	0-0	0-0	7	0	0	2	4
Khalil Farmer	G	13	1-3	1-3	1-3	0	0	1	1	4
Jaquan Carlos	Guard	37	1-5	0-3	0-0	7	4	4	1	2
German Plotnikov	G	28	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
KiJan Robinson	G	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Hampton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joshua Lusane	Forward	21	6-7	1-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	13
Ja'Von Benson	Forward	19	5-7	0-0	1-2	11	0	0	0	11
Jerry Deng	F	30	4-11	0-4	2-2	9	2	0	2	10
Tedrick Wilcox	Guard	32	3-14	2-7	0-0	5	1	0	0	8
Tristan Maxwell	Guard	27	3-7	2-5	0-0	2	0	2	0	8
Ford Cooper	Guard	28	2-7	1-4	0-0	1	5	0	0	5
Jordan Nesbitt	Guard	26	1-5	0-0	0-0	0	3	0	0	2
Dan Banister Jr.	Guard	17	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

62.6Possessions62.6

100.6Offensive Efficiency94.2

94.2Defensive Efficiency100.6

6.4Net Efficiency-6.4

50.0%Effective FG%46.6%

51.4%True Shooting %48.5%

14.5%Turnover Rate19.1%

15.8%Free Throw Rate10.3%

36.8%3-Point Rate36.2%

1.11Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 62.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.