Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.9%Queens University

52.1%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -2.8

PROJECTED TOTAL163.5

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -109

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 80

Projected Total163.5

Projected ScoreLipscomb 83

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricLipscomb

51.7MMH Power Index47.9

118.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

117.0Defensive Efficiency107.6

1.4Net Efficiency3.7

0.1Strength of Schedule-2.5

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

71.4Tempo68.8

56.6%Effective FG%54.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

37.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%

0.9Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.5), recent form (1.5–-1.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.4), average scoring margin (2.5–0.9).

Final

Queens University

88—90

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 2 • 70.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATLipscomb

37-74FG35-67

50.0%FG%52.0%

10-273PT10-28

37.0%3PT%36.0%

4-7FT10-13

57.0%FT%77.0%

39Rebounds34

15Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists12

8Turnovers8

3Steals6

5Blocks4

14Fouls10

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ McKee	Guard	33	9-15	4-6	1-2	3	3	0	2	23
Deyton Albury	G	32	11-19	0-2	0-0	11	6	0	0	22
BJ McLaurin	Forward	28	6-14	4-8	0-0	7	1	0	0	16
Bryce Cash	Guard	32	3-6	0-0	2-3	4	1	1	0	8
Malcolm Wilson	Forward	12	4-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2	8
Chris Ashby	G	23	2-11	2-9	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Jacobi Sebock	Guard	20	2-3	0-1	0-0	6	1	2	0	4
Kalib Mathews	Guard	12	0-0	0-0	1-2	4	2	0	1	1
Jaxon Pollard	F	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrin Boyd	Guard	30	10-13	5-6	4-5	4	0	0	0	29
Will Pruitt	Guard	32	5-13	1-4	2-2	6	2	2	0	13
Owen McCormack	Center	25	5-11	1-6	2-2	7	3	0	1	13
AJ McGinnis	Guard	26	5-11	2-8	0-0	2	0	1	0	12
Cody Head	G	18	5-7	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	11
Grant Asman	F	18	2-3	1-1	1-2	4	0	0	1	6
Dylan Faulkner	F	15	3-4	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	2	6
Joe Anderson	Guard	30	0-5	0-3	0-1	2	7	3	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.8Possessions70.8

124.3Offensive Efficiency127.1

127.1Defensive Efficiency124.3

-2.8Net Efficiency2.8

56.8%Effective FG%59.7%

56.9%True Shooting %61.5%

11.4%Turnover Rate11.2%

9.5%Free Throw Rate19.4%

36.5%3-Point Rate41.8%

1.75Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 70.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.