Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.6%Clemson

41.4%Syracuse

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -142

Syracuse

15-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 72

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreSyracuse 71

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricSyracuse

59.9MMH Power Index52.2

112.6Offensive Efficiency109.2

101.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

11.2Net Efficiency2.6

4.6Strength of Schedule5.6

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1

63.6Tempo69.0

53.0%Effective FG%52.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %29.0%

38.1%Free Throw Rate36.2%

7.2Average Margin1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–106.6), net efficiency (11.2–2.6).

Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–4.6), offensive rebounding (29.0–27.0).

Final

Clemson

77—68

Syracuse

Clemson by 9 • 71.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATSyracuse

31-51FG25-64

61.0%FG%39.0%

6-143PT7-23

43.0%3PT%30.0%

9-13FT11-15

69.0%FT%73.0%

41Rebounds24

7Offensive Rebounds8

17Assists11

21Turnovers8

5Steals14

5Blocks2

12Fouls15

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joseph Girard III	Guard	37	5-6	4-5	4-4	4	2	1	0	18
PJ Hall	Center	32	7-9	0-2	1-2	10	3	0	3	15
Chase Hunter	Guard	37	6-9	0-0	2-2	3	7	1	0	14
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	23	5-5	1-1	2-3	6	2	1	1	13
RJ Godfrey	F	14	3-6	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	6
Jack Clark	Forward	29	2-6	1-3	0-0	10	1	0	1	5
Chauncey Wiggins	F	17	2-7	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	4
Dillon Hunter	G	11	1-3	0-1	0-2	1	0	1	0	2

Syracuse

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chris Bell	F	37	4-13	4-10	4-5	3	1	0	2	16
J.J. Starling	G	36	7-14	1-5	1-2	3	0	2	0	16
Judah Mintz	Guard	40	6-18	1-3	1-2	2	5	1	0	14
Quadir Copeland	G	28	4-9	0-1	5-6	4	3	3	0	13
Maliq Brown	F	36	4-7	1-2	0-0	8	1	4	0	9
Justin Taylor	G	19	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	4	0	0
Mounir Hima	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.2Possessions71.2

108.1Offensive Efficiency95.5

95.5Defensive Efficiency108.1

12.6Net Efficiency-12.6

66.7%Effective FG%44.5%

67.3%True Shooting %47.8%

29.5%Turnover Rate11.2%

25.5%Free Throw Rate23.4%

27.5%3-Point Rate35.9%

0.81Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

Clemson won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 71.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.