
Kent State
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.1%Kent State
60.9%Troy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTroy -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL162.1
MODEL MONEYLINETroy -156

Troy
22-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 79
Projected Total162.1
Projected ScoreTroy 83
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index54.1
113.9Offensive Efficiency112.6
107.6Defensive Efficiency103.9
6.3Net Efficiency8.7
-0.1Strength of Schedule-2.2
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency2.0
74.0Tempo70.4
53.0%Effective FG%52.1%
17.7%Turnover Rate17.1%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
43.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%
4.7Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–54.1), offensive efficiency (113.9–112.6), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.2), recent form (2.1–2.0).
Troy COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.9–107.6), net efficiency (8.7–6.3), ball security (17.1–17.7).