Kennesaw State

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.9%Kennesaw State

41.1%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADKennesaw State -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL157.9

MODEL MONEYLINEKennesaw State -143

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKennesaw State 80

Projected Total157.9

Projected ScoreLipscomb 78

Team Comparison

Kennesaw StateMetricLipscomb

55.7MMH Power Index47.9

113.6Offensive Efficiency111.3

104.3Defensive Efficiency107.6

9.3Net Efficiency3.7

-2.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

72.9Tempo68.8

52.2%Effective FG%54.8%

16.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

35.7%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

44.9%Free Throw Rate26.5%

6.8Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kennesaw State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKennesaw State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (113.6–111.3), defensive efficiency (104.3–107.6), net efficiency (9.3–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-2.8), shooting efficiency (54.8–52.2), ball security (16.0–16.3).

Final

Kennesaw State

95—101

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 6 • 75.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kennesaw StateTEAM STATLipscomb

32-66FG32-57

48.0%FG%56.0%

13-313PT5-18

42.0%3PT%28.0%

18-27FT32-40

67.0%FT%80.0%

34Rebounds38

12Offensive Rebounds8

16Assists9

8Turnovers8

3Steals5

2Blocks4

30Fouls21

Player Box Score

Kennesaw State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Terrell Burden	Guard	34	9-19	3-8	12-16	3	7	1	1	33
RJ Johnson	G	34	7-14	3-7	2-4	2	6	0	0	19
Demond Robinson	Forward	31	6-11	2-4	1-2	11	0	1	0	15
Quincy Ademokoya	Guard	15	2-3	2-3	3-4	4	2	0	0	9
Jamel King	Forward	20	3-7	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	7
Simeon Cottle	G	11	2-6	2-5	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Jusaun Holt	G	28	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	2
Frankquon Sherman	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-1	4	0	0	0	2
Rongie Gordon	Forward	11	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	2

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Will Pruitt	Guard	35	7-12	0-2	10-10	7	1	3	2	24
Owen McCormack	Center	22	4-7	1-4	7-7	5	2	0	0	16
Joe Anderson	Guard	33	6-10	1-3	2-3	2	5	1	0	15
AJ McGinnis	Guard	34	5-10	2-5	1-2	0	1	1	0	13
Derrin Boyd	Guard	12	4-6	0-1	5-5	4	0	0	0	13
Grant Asman	F	19	2-4	1-2	1-2	2	0	0	1	6
Cody Head	G	20	1-4	0-1	3-5	3	0	0	0	5
Rylan Houck	Forward	13	2-3	0-0	1-4	6	0	0	0	5
Dylan Faulkner	F	12	1-1	0-0	2-2	7	0	0	1	4

Advanced Game Stats

75.4Possessions75.4

126.0Offensive Efficiency134.0

134.0Defensive Efficiency126.0

-8.0Net Efficiency8.0

58.3%Effective FG%60.5%

60.3%True Shooting %66.4%

10.7%Turnover Rate10.5%

40.9%Free Throw Rate70.2%

47.0%3-Point Rate31.6%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.13

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 75.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.