California Baptist

25-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

67.2%California Baptist

32.8%Utah Tech

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCalifornia Baptist -3.3

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia Baptist -205

Utah Tech

19-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCalifornia Baptist 75

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreUtah Tech 72

Team Comparison

California BaptistMetricUtah Tech

58.3MMH Power Index47.3

106.5Offensive Efficiency108.8

99.0Defensive Efficiency106.1

7.5Net Efficiency2.7

1.8Strength of Schedule-2.3

11.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.0

68.2Tempo70.6

48.8%Effective FG%54.4%

17.9%Turnover Rate17.5%

37.0%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

37.0%Free Throw Rate32.8%

5.1Average Margin1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

California Baptist HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia Baptist holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.3–47.3), defensive efficiency (99.0–106.1), net efficiency (7.5–2.7), strength of schedule (1.8–-2.3).

Utah Tech COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.8–106.5), shooting efficiency (54.4–48.8), ball security (17.5–17.9).

Final

California Baptist

78—85

Utah Tech

Utah Tech by 7 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

California BaptistTEAM STATUtah Tech

26-54FG30-49

48.0%FG%61.0%

8-233PT3-7

35.0%3PT%43.0%

18-29FT22-24

62.0%FT%92.0%

29Rebounds24

12Offensive Rebounds3

10Assists14

13Turnovers10

3Steals9

1Blocks1

23Fouls22

Player Box Score

California Baptist

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Scotty Washington	G	39	7-16	5-11	1-1	1	0	0	0	20
Blondeau Tchoukuiegno	Guard	33	5-9	1-2	5-10	2	5	2	0	16
Hunter Goodrick	Forward	24	2-3	0-0	7-10	6	2	1	0	11
Yvan Ouedraogo	Forward	36	3-6	0-0	3-5	6	2	0	1	9
Kendal Coleman	Forward	15	3-3	0-0	2-3	6	0	0	0	8
Tylen Riley	G	15	3-6	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	7
Chris Chiles	Guard	14	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Brantly Stevenson	Guard	19	1-8	0-5	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Malik Wade	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Utah Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylen Searles	G	38	12-16	1-4	8-9	8	4	4	0	33
Beon Riley	Guard	28	5-8	0-0	2-2	4	1	0	0	12
Tanner Christensen	Center	37	4-8	0-0	1-1	4	4	1	0	9
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	30	2-5	1-1	2-2	1	1	1	0	7
Hamed Olayinka	F	9	3-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	1	6
Unisa Turay	Guard	22	2-4	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	5
Aric Demings	Guard	19	1-4	0-1	2-2	1	3	1	0	4
Tennessee Rainwater	F	2	0-0	0-0	4-4	3	0	0	0	4
Angelo Kambala	Guard	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Caleb Stearman	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	1	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1

114.5Offensive Efficiency124.8

124.8Defensive Efficiency114.5

-10.3Net Efficiency10.3

55.6%Effective FG%64.3%

57.5%True Shooting %70.4%

18.9%Turnover Rate14.8%

53.7%Free Throw Rate49.0%

42.6%3-Point Rate14.3%

0.77Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

Utah Tech won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.