Pennsylvania logo

Pennsylvania

18-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.1%Pennsylvania
36.9%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL146.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -171
Princeton logo

Princeton

9-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 74
Projected Total146.2
Projected ScorePrinceton 72

Team Comparison

52.9MMH Power Index43.5
108.6Offensive Efficiency105.1
106.4Defensive Efficiency110.3
2.2Net Efficiency-5.2
1.9Strength of Schedule1.7
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
69.9Tempo65.2
50.9%Effective FG%50.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate16.9%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
36.3%Free Throw Rate35.0%
1.5Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.6–105.1), defensive efficiency (106.4–110.3), net efficiency (2.2–-5.2).
Final
Pennsylvania logo
Pennsylvania
70—77
Princeton logo
Princeton
Princeton by 7 • 64.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PennsylvaniaTEAM STATPrinceton
24-54FG26-58
44.0%FG%45.0%
7-213PT16-38
33.0%3PT%42.0%
15-17FT9-14
88.0%FT%64.0%
37Rebounds30
6Offensive Rebounds5
11Assists15
8Turnovers6
5Steals3
1Blocks—
14Fouls10

Player Box Score

Pennsylvania
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nick SpinosoForward378-140-33-4142210019
Tyler PerkinsG244-92-34-552100014
Sam BrownG383-71-23-323000010
Clark SlajchertGuard364-110-22-263100010
George SmithGuard352-61-53-35110008
Niklas PolonowskiG91-11-10-00000003
Andrew LaczkowskiGuard91-31-20-02000003
Reese McMullenGuard41-11-10-01000003
Ed Holland IIIG80-20-20-01000000
Princeton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Xaivian LeeG357-123-65-6105000022
Caden PierceF366-142-63-4114100017
Zach MartiniCenter345-135-120-022000015
Blake PetersGuard274-104-100-200200012
Matt AlloccoGuard373-52-31-20300009
Dalen DavisG171-40-10-01100002
Jack ScottG110-00-00-05000000
Jacob HugginsF30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.9Possessions64.9
107.9Offensive Efficiency118.6
118.6Defensive Efficiency107.9
-10.8Net Efficiency10.8
50.9%Effective FG%58.6%
56.4%True Shooting %59.6%
12.5%Turnover Rate9.1%
31.5%Free Throw Rate24.1%
38.9%3-Point Rate65.5%
1.38Assist / Turnover2.50
Game Summary
Princeton won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 64.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.