UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

80.3%UC Irvine

19.7%UC Riverside

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -9.6

PROJECTED TOTAL150.0

MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -408

UC Riverside

10-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 80

Projected Total150.0

Projected ScoreUC Riverside 70

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricUC Riverside

58.4MMH Power Index41.2

106.9Offensive Efficiency103.1

95.0Defensive Efficiency110.1

11.9Net Efficiency-7.0

-1.0Strength of Schedule0.5

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1

72.3Tempo70.7

50.7%Effective FG%49.8%

17.6%Turnover Rate18.5%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %28.5%

36.5%Free Throw Rate35.2%

8.6Average Margin-4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–41.2), offensive efficiency (106.9–103.1), defensive efficiency (95.0–110.1), net efficiency (11.9–-7.0).

UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-1.0).

Final

UC Irvine

78—88

UC Riverside

UC Riverside by 10 • 72.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATUC Riverside

29-67FG28-59

43.0%FG%47.0%

7-193PT13-27

37.0%3PT%48.0%

13-15FT19-24

87.0%FT%79.0%

35Rebounds35

11Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists20

9Turnovers10

4Steals7

3Blocks4

16Fouls13

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pierre Crockrell II	Guard	31	7-8	0-0	0-0	4	5	1	0	14
Carter Welling	F	20	4-10	2-4	4-4	6	0	0	1	14
Andre Henry	G	29	4-8	3-4	0-0	4	2	0	0	11
Derin Saran	G	15	3-11	0-0	2-2	4	2	0	0	8
Justin Hohn	Guard	29	2-7	1-5	1-2	3	1	1	0	6
Devin Tillis	F	23	3-9	0-3	0-0	2	2	1	0	6
Dylan Thoerner	Guard	10	1-3	0-1	3-3	2	1	0	1	5
Dean Keeler	Forward	11	2-3	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	4
Hayden Welling	F	6	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	4
Bent Leuchten	Center	9	0-4	0-1	3-4	2	0	0	0	3
Langston Redfield	G	5	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

UC Riverside

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Benjamin Griscti	Not Available	30	10-15	6-10	0-0	4	0	0	3	26
Kyle Owens	Forward	28	5-11	2-4	4-4	7	3	1	0	16
Isaiah Moses	G	28	4-8	0-1	5-5	4	1	0	0	13
Nate Pickens	G	32	3-6	2-4	4-6	5	6	1	1	12
Luke Turner	Forward	13	3-4	3-4	0-0	2	1	1	0	9
Barrington Hargress	G	32	2-9	0-4	3-5	3	8	2	0	7
Vlad Salaridze	F	6	0-1	0-0	3-3	4	0	1	0	3
Kaleb Smith	F	14	1-4	0-0	0-1	5	1	0	0	2
Wil Tattersall	Forward	17	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.3Possessions72.3

107.9Offensive Efficiency121.7

121.7Defensive Efficiency107.9

-13.8Net Efficiency13.8

48.5%Effective FG%58.5%

52.6%True Shooting %62.5%

12.5%Turnover Rate13.8%

22.4%Free Throw Rate40.7%

28.4%3-Point Rate45.8%

1.44Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

UC Riverside won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 72.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.