Pepperdine

9-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.0%Pepperdine

86.0%Loyola Marymount

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLoyola Marymount -13.4

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Marymount -614

Loyola Marymount

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePepperdine 69

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 82

Team Comparison

PepperdineMetricLoyola Marymount

38.2MMH Power Index49.9

103.2Offensive Efficiency107.0

113.6Defensive Efficiency103.8

-10.4Net Efficiency3.2

0.7Strength of Schedule0.5

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.2

70.0Tempo69.4

48.7%Effective FG%52.8%

18.3%Turnover Rate17.2%

31.1%Offensive Rebound %27.3%

34.0%Free Throw Rate32.1%

-7.3Average Margin2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Loyola Marymount HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–38.2), offensive efficiency (107.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (103.8–113.6), net efficiency (3.2–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–0.5), offensive rebounding (31.1–27.3), free throw rate (34.0–32.1).

Final

Pepperdine

72—63

Loyola Marymount

Pepperdine by 9 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PepperdineTEAM STATLoyola Marymount

28-63FG24-58

44.0%FG%41.0%

5-183PT4-14

28.0%3PT%29.0%

11-14FT11-15

79.0%FT%73.0%

38Rebounds32

12Offensive Rebounds7

9Assists8

8Turnovers9

2Steals3

4Blocks4

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Ajayi	F	40	7-13	1-2	2-2	13	0	0	1	17
Houston Mallette	G	30	3-8	1-4	6-6	1	1	0	0	13
Jevon Porter	F	40	5-12	0-2	1-1	6	2	1	2	11
Cord Stansberry	G	13	5-9	0-3	1-2	3	0	1	0	11
Nils Cooper	G	25	3-6	1-2	1-1	5	1	0	0	8
Malik Messina-Moore	G	37	3-9	1-4	0-0	5	5	0	0	7
Ethan Anderson	Guard	15	2-6	1-1	0-2	3	0	0	1	5

Loyola Marymount

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Alex Merkviladze	Forward	40	5-11	2-5	5-5	9	1	0	0	17
Justice Hill	Guard	38	5-15	0-2	3-4	4	5	0	1	13
Will Johnston	G	40	5-12	1-6	1-2	2	1	1	0	12
Justin Wright	G	39	4-12	1-1	2-4	4	1	1	0	11
Lars Thiemann	Center	22	3-5	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	6
Michael Graham	Forward	20	2-3	0-0	0-0	7	0	0	3	4
Kevin Carney	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

108.4Offensive Efficiency94.9

94.9Defensive Efficiency108.4

13.6Net Efficiency-13.6

48.4%Effective FG%44.8%

51.7%True Shooting %48.4%

12.2%Turnover Rate13.4%

22.2%Free Throw Rate25.9%

28.6%3-Point Rate24.1%

1.13Assist / Turnover0.89

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.