Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.9%Alabama A&M

60.1%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -4.2

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -151

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreGrambling 74

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricGrambling

42.3MMH Power Index41.4

105.9Offensive Efficiency100.7

106.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-0.7Net Efficiency0.3

-6.8Strength of Schedule-5.7

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

68.0Tempo69.9

49.7%Effective FG%49.2%

16.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

45.7%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-0.5Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Alabama A&M

60—50

Grambling

Alabama A&M by 10 • 69.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATGrambling

19-56FG16-55

34.0%FG%29.0%

null-93PT2-16

0.0%3PT%13.0%

22-30FT16-27

73.0%FT%59.0%

56Rebounds32

20Offensive Rebounds11

4Assists4

19Turnovers13

8Steals11

4Blocks6

19Fouls19

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Tucker	Guard	31	4-8	0-1	6-6	5	1	1	1	14
Omari Peek	Guard	23	6-14	0-1	2-2	5	0	0	0	14
Chad Moodie	F	24	4-7	0-0	3-4	12	0	0	1	11
Jayland Randall	G	12	2-5	0-1	1-2	1	1	1	0	5
Caleb Blackwell	G	14	0-0	0-0	4-6	2	0	1	0	4
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	22	0-5	0-3	3-4	3	0	1	0	3
EJ Williams	Center	13	1-5	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
William Tavares	Center	13	1-2	0-1	0-0	6	2	0	0	2
AC Bryant	G	12	0-3	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
London Riley	Guard	4	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Eric Lee	Guard	7	0-2	0-0	1-4	3	0	1	1	1
Darius Osborne	Forward	25	0-1	0-0	0-0	7	0	2	1	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	33	4-11	0-2	3-3	5	0	1	0	11
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	31	4-14	0-2	1-3	4	0	4	0	9
Jourdan Smith	Guard	31	0-8	0-2	6-8	8	2	1	5	6
Jonathan Aku	Forward	25	3-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	6
Quintin Murrell	Guard	11	1-2	1-2	2-2	0	0	0	0	5
Zahad Munford	Guard	16	1-3	0-1	1-2	2	0	0	0	3
Terrence Lewis	Guard	14	1-5	0-3	1-2	1	1	2	0	3
Mikale Stevenson	G	11	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Jimel Cofer Jr.	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Malik Lamin	Center	2	0-0	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.6Possessions69.6

86.2Offensive Efficiency71.8

71.8Defensive Efficiency86.2

14.4Net Efficiency-14.4

33.9%Effective FG%30.9%

42.7%True Shooting %36.9%

27.4%Turnover Rate18.6%

53.6%Free Throw Rate49.1%

16.1%3-Point Rate29.1%

0.21Assist / Turnover0.31

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 69.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.