Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

15.1%Texas A&M

84.9%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -11.9

PROJECTED TOTAL161.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -562

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75

Projected Total161.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricVanderbilt

58MMH Power Index68.9

116.1Offensive Efficiency120.9

108.4Defensive Efficiency105.7

7.7Net Efficiency15.2

4.8Strength of Schedule7.4

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.1Tempo70.9

53.5%Effective FG%55.3%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.5%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

37.5%Free Throw Rate39.3%

5.3Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–58.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–116.1), defensive efficiency (105.7–108.4), net efficiency (15.2–7.7).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.8).

Final

Texas A&M

73—74

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 1 • 59.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATVanderbilt

24-47FG26-60

51.0%FG%43.0%

8-183PT7-23

44.0%3PT%30.0%

17-17FT15-18

100.0%FT%83.0%

30Rebounds28

8Offensive Rebounds13

10Assists10

12Turnovers5

1Steals6

4Blocks5

14Fouls12

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	35	5-12	2-6	6-6	3	1	0	0	18
Tyrece Radford	Guard	29	6-10	1-2	4-4	1	4	0	0	17
Henry Coleman III	Forward	22	3-6	0-0	7-7	4	0	0	0	13
Jace Carter	Not Available	35	4-9	3-6	0-0	4	2	0	1	11
Solomon Washington	F	33	3-5	1-2	0-0	3	2	1	2	7
Andersson Garcia	Forward	24	2-3	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	1	4
Hayden Hefner	Guard	12	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Wildens Leveque	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Manny Obaseki	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ven-Allen Lubin	F	29	9-13	1-3	6-7	5	0	0	1	25
Ezra Manjon	Guard	35	7-17	1-3	4-4	3	4	3	1	19
Evan Taylor	Guard	22	5-9	2-6	0-0	1	0	0	2	12
Tyrin Lawrence	Guard	29	2-7	1-3	3-4	4	1	1	1	8
Isaiah West	G	21	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	3	0	0	3
Paul Lewis	G	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	11	0-4	0-2	2-3	2	0	0	0	2
Malik Presley	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	18	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
JaQualon Roberts	F	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jordan Williams	G	7	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

59.9Possessions59.9

121.9Offensive Efficiency123.5

123.5Defensive Efficiency121.9

-1.7Net Efficiency1.7

59.6%Effective FG%49.2%

66.3%True Shooting %54.0%

20.3%Turnover Rate8.3%

36.2%Free Throw Rate30.0%

38.3%3-Point Rate38.3%

0.83Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 59.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.