Miami logo

Miami

26-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.9%Miami
47.1%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -0.0
PROJECTED TOTAL145.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -112
Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiami 72
Projected Total145.0
Projected ScoreClemson 73

Team Comparison

65.5MMH Power Index59.9
117.8Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.0Defensive Efficiency101.4
14.8Net Efficiency11.2
3.6Strength of Schedule4.6
3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.2Tempo63.6
55.5%Effective FG%53.0%
16.2%Turnover Rate14.0%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
37.9%Free Throw Rate38.1%
10.3Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (117.8–112.6), net efficiency (14.8–11.2), recent form (3.6–-4.7).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–103.0), strength of schedule (4.6–3.6), ball security (14.0–16.2).
Final
Miami logo
Miami
60—77
Clemson logo
Clemson
Clemson by 17 • 65.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATClemson
22-59FG25-56
37.0%FG%45.0%
12-323PT13-30
38.0%3PT%43.0%
4-5FT14-17
80.0%FT%82.0%
34Rebounds36
8Offensive Rebounds7
17Assists18
12Turnovers8
4Steals5
2Blocks2
12Fouls6

Player Box Score

Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Norchad OmierForward377-151-43-3121100018
Kyshawn GeorgeForward325-93-60-056100013
Wooga PoplarGuard364-113-70-021000011
Matthew ClevelandGuard373-102-51-25121009
Bensley JosephGuard253-63-60-02501009
Nijel PackG250-70-40-02300000
Mike NwokoF60-10-00-02000000
Jakai RobinsonG20-00-00-00000000
Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chase HunterGuard316-145-83-434100020
Joseph Girard IIIGuard395-143-115-535100018
PJ HallCenter314-92-53-461000013
Jack ClarkForward273-51-21-26322008
Joshua BeadleG202-40-12-21210006
Ian SchieffelinForward322-51-10-011300005
RJ GodfreyF92-30-00-02000004
Chauncey WigginsF51-11-10-00000003
Dillon HunterG60-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3
91.9Offensive Efficiency117.9
117.9Defensive Efficiency91.9
-26.0Net Efficiency26.0
47.5%Effective FG%56.3%
48.9%True Shooting %60.1%
18.4%Turnover Rate12.3%
8.5%Free Throw Rate30.4%
54.2%3-Point Rate53.6%
1.42Assist / Turnover2.25
Game Summary
Clemson won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.