UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
92.2%UMBC
7.8%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -14.8
PROJECTED TOTAL137.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -1182
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 76
Projected Total137.4
Projected ScoreBinghamton 61

Team Comparison

59.1MMH Power Index32.4
113.0Offensive Efficiency102.2
99.0Defensive Efficiency112.3
14.0Net Efficiency-10.1
-5.6Strength of Schedule-6.0
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
65.5Tempo64.2
54.3%Effective FG%51.3%
14.3%Turnover Rate18.5%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
34.1%Free Throw Rate42.8%
9.1Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (113.0–102.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.3), net efficiency (14.0–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–34.1).
Final
UMBC logo
UMBC
89—78
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
UMBC by 11 • 69.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATBinghamton
32-62FG30-70
52.0%FG%43.0%
12-243PT5-22
50.0%3PT%23.0%
13-19FT13-17
68.0%FT%76.0%
39Rebounds38
13Offensive Rebounds16
12Assists16
11Turnovers7
4Steals5
9Blocks6
13Fouls16

Player Box Score

UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dion BrownG349-151-23-3124210022
Marcus Banks Jr.G368-175-110-122100021
Regimantas CiunysF285-92-53-6102000015
Franck EmmouG255-92-20-161100012
Ace ValentineG322-31-24-51100009
Max Lorca-LloydCenter152-40-03-31107007
Devan SappGuard151-31-20-01101003
Marlon ShortGuard100-10-00-01000000
Ashton ReeseGuard50-10-00-00000000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Armon HarriedGuard387-110-05-636010019
Tymu CheneryGuard387-142-50-062110016
Nehemiah BensonForward194-61-12-431000011
Chris WalkerG313-101-53-393200010
Tariq BalogunForward184-80-01-25101009
Dan PetcashGuard322-131-92-24222007
Gavin WalshF143-60-10-05101006
Evan AsheG100-20-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.1Possessions69.1
128.8Offensive Efficiency112.9
112.9Defensive Efficiency128.8
15.9Net Efficiency-15.9
61.3%Effective FG%46.4%
62.7%True Shooting %50.0%
15.9%Turnover Rate10.1%
30.6%Free Throw Rate24.3%
38.7%3-Point Rate31.4%
1.09Assist / Turnover2.29
Game Summary
UMBC won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 69.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.