
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.0%SMU
18.0%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -9.0
PROJECTED TOTAL158.0
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -456

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 83
Projected Total158.0
Projected ScoreTulane 75
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index44.3
118.2Offensive Efficiency105.3
109.6Defensive Efficiency109.9
8.6Net Efficiency-4.6
7.0Strength of Schedule2.7
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
71.1Tempo68.7
55.7%Effective FG%49.6%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
31.3%Free Throw Rate44.8%
6.1Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–44.3), offensive efficiency (118.2–105.3), defensive efficiency (109.6–109.9), net efficiency (8.6–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (44.8–31.3).