Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

77.7%Merrimack

22.3%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.8

PROJECTED TOTAL133.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -348

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 70

Projected Total133.4

Projected ScoreStonehill 64

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricStonehill

53.7MMH Power Index37.9

106.4Offensive Efficiency97.5

103.2Defensive Efficiency100.7

3.2Net Efficiency-3.2

0.7Strength of Schedule-5.4

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

64.4Tempo68.1

49.3%Effective FG%48.0%

14.8%Turnover Rate19.1%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

39.5%Free Throw Rate29.2%

2.1Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–97.5), net efficiency (3.2–-3.2), strength of schedule (0.7–-5.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–103.2), offensive rebounding (28.4–24.7).

Final

Merrimack

66—63

Stonehill

Merrimack by 3 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATStonehill

24-55FG26-59

44.0%FG%44.0%

7-193PT6-23

37.0%3PT%26.0%

11-13FT5-8

85.0%FT%63.0%

31Rebounds36

7Offensive Rebounds10

8Assists21

14Turnovers14

7Steals7

6Blocks2

13Fouls13

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Adam Clark	G	37	12-22	1-3	4-4	3	6	2	0	29
Bryan Etumnu	F	37	4-8	1-3	0-0	7	0	0	5	9
Samba Diallo	Forward	30	3-8	1-2	1-1	7	0	0	0	8
Jordan Derkack	G	37	1-8	0-3	5-6	8	1	2	1	7
Jordan McKoy	Guard	25	2-3	2-2	1-2	4	0	2	0	7
Devon Savage	Guard	23	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	1	1	0	6
Jaylen Stinson	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Elliott Black	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Armandas Plintauskas	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Zegarowski	Forward	37	9-13	1-5	0-1	6	2	0	0	19
Tony Felder	Guard	38	4-12	2-9	2-3	8	3	2	0	12
Jackson Benigni	G	34	2-6	2-6	1-2	3	2	1	0	7
Louie Semona III	F	30	3-10	1-3	0-0	3	1	0	0	7
Todd Brogna	F	33	3-7	0-0	0-0	8	10	3	1	6
Pano Pavlidis	Forward	16	2-6	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	4
Nathan McGill	Guard	7	1-1	0-0	2-2	3	1	1	1	4
Thatcher Stone	G	5	2-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5

97.8Offensive Efficiency93.3

93.3Defensive Efficiency97.8

4.4Net Efficiency-4.4

50.0%Effective FG%49.2%

53.9%True Shooting %50.2%

20.5%Turnover Rate21.0%

23.6%Free Throw Rate13.6%

34.5%3-Point Rate39.0%

0.57Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.