Rice logo

Rice

13-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.3%Rice
93.7%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -18.4
PROJECTED TOTAL156.4
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -1487
Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 69
Projected Total156.4
Projected ScoreTulsa 87

Team Comparison

RiceMetricTulsa
45.1MMH Power Index64.8
108.3Offensive Efficiency121.1
109.2Defensive Efficiency104.8
-0.9Net Efficiency16.3
-2.2Strength of Schedule0.0
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
68.3Tempo70.2
49.7%Effective FG%55.4%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
34.7%Free Throw Rate42.4%
-0.6Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–45.1), offensive efficiency (121.1–108.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.2), net efficiency (16.3–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.7–33.8).
Final
Rice logo
Rice
82—93
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
Tulsa by 11 • 75.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATTulsa
30-66FG30-65
45.0%FG%46.0%
6-203PT11-24
30.0%3PT%46.0%
16-23FT22-26
70.0%FT%85.0%
41Rebounds36
10Offensive Rebounds7
14Assists20
9Turnovers5
4Steals8
4Blocks3
18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Rice
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Travis EveeGuard428-143-72-340000021
Max FiedlerForward389-120-02-294210020
Alem HuseinovicGuard394-102-74-632200014
Mekhi MasonG314-161-53-475010012
Andrew AkuchieF163-50-01-26000007
Keanu DawesF320-10-04-46301004
Anthony SeldenGuard181-50-00-23001002
Noah ShelbyG71-20-10-00000002
Ifeanyi UfochukwuC20-10-00-00000000
Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
PJ HaggertyG419-151-211-14106200030
Jared GarciaF264-101-55-551110014
Isaiah BarnesG374-94-50-021100012
Cobe WilliamsGuard383-133-62-353300011
Matt ReedF103-51-22-23100009
Tyshawn ArchieG182-40-12-25410006
Carlous WilliamsF202-41-20-04300005
Jesaiah McWrightG262-40-10-00100004
Mohamed KeitaC91-10-00-00002002

Advanced Game Stats

75.7Possessions75.7
108.3Offensive Efficiency122.9
122.9Defensive Efficiency108.3
-14.5Net Efficiency14.5
50.0%Effective FG%54.6%
53.3%True Shooting %60.1%
11.9%Turnover Rate6.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate40.0%
30.3%3-Point Rate36.9%
1.56Assist / Turnover4.00
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 75.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.