Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.7%Mississippi Valley State

96.3%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -22.8

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -2603

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 62

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 85

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricAlabama A&M

17.7MMH Power Index42.3

91.1Offensive Efficiency105.9

117.8Defensive Efficiency106.6

-26.7Net Efficiency-0.7

-4.1Strength of Schedule-6.8

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

70.5Tempo68.0

45.8%Effective FG%49.7%

21.8%Turnover Rate16.8%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

34.5%Free Throw Rate45.7%

-18.8Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–17.7), offensive efficiency (105.9–91.1), defensive efficiency (106.6–117.8), net efficiency (-0.7–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-6.8).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

57—80

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 23 • 66.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATAlabama A&M

17-52FG25-51

33.0%FG%49.0%

5-163PT5-14

31.0%3PT%36.0%

18-22FT25-29

82.0%FT%86.0%

30Rebounds34

13Offensive Rebounds10

5Assists12

18Turnovers11

7Steals8

1Blocks6

22Fouls21

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rayquan Brown	Guard	38	11-18	3-6	13-14	5	0	1	1	38
Reginald Reynolds	Forward	19	2-4	1-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
Donovan Sanders	Guard	28	1-7	0-0	1-1	4	0	2	0	3
George Ivory III	G	19	1-4	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jordan Johnson	Guard	16	0-1	0-0	3-4	4	1	0	0	3
Arecko Gipson	Guard	13	1-7	0-1	1-2	1	0	1	0	3
Danny Washington	Guard	28	1-4	0-2	0-1	3	3	0	0	2
Ernest Minton	Guard	17	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Quorien Waldon	Forward	8	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Markell Petro	Guard	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Walter Hamilton	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Umoh	Center	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	21	4-10	3-5	2-2	7	1	0	1	13
Chad Moodie	F	24	5-6	0-0	2-2	4	1	1	1	12
Omari Peek	Guard	21	3-7	0-0	4-4	3	0	0	0	10
Jayland Randall	G	20	2-5	0-2	6-6	5	1	1	1	10
EJ Williams	Center	13	4-6	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	9
AC Bryant	G	13	2-4	0-0	5-8	1	1	1	0	9
Cameron Tucker	Guard	24	1-2	0-1	3-3	3	6	3	0	5
London Riley	Guard	16	1-5	1-4	0-0	0	1	0	1	3
Darius Osborne	Forward	15	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	3
Caleb Blackwell	G	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Eric Lee	Guard	10	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	1	0	2
Dylan Mclean	Guard	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	2
William Tavares	Center	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.7Possessions66.7

85.5Offensive Efficiency119.9

119.9Defensive Efficiency85.5

-34.5Net Efficiency34.5

37.5%Effective FG%53.9%

45.6%True Shooting %61.8%

26.7%Turnover Rate16.7%

42.3%Free Throw Rate56.9%

30.8%3-Point Rate27.5%

0.28Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 66.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.