UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.1%UT Arlington

76.9%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL140.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -333

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 66

Projected Total140.8

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

49.6MMH Power Index55.8

102.7Offensive Efficiency112.6

97.9Defensive Efficiency103.1

4.8Net Efficiency9.5

-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.9

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

68.1Tempo67.4

48.5%Effective FG%55.7%

20.4%Turnover Rate17.9%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

43.7%Free Throw Rate29.6%

3.3Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.7), net efficiency (9.5–4.8), recent form (12.3–-3.9).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–103.1), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.9), offensive rebounding (36.0–29.2).

Final

UT Arlington

89—70

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Arlington by 19 • 75.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

34-67FG25-57

51.0%FG%44.0%

9-233PT7-22

39.0%3PT%32.0%

12-20FT13-21

60.0%FT%62.0%

42Rebounds32

14Offensive Rebounds9

19Assists14

14Turnovers17

9Steals5

2Blocks1

21Fouls19

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aaron Cash	Guard	27	8-15	1-1	0-0	5	3	4	0	17
DaJuan Gordon	Guard	23	7-8	0-0	2-5	8	4	2	0	16
Shemar Wilson	Forward	19	6-9	0-1	3-3	7	1	0	1	15
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	18	3-5	3-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	9
Fabio Basili	Guard	7	2-5	1-4	4-6	0	0	0	0	9
Akili Vining	Guard	10	2-4	2-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	6
Sterling Gaston-Chapman	Guard	14	1-2	0-1	2-4	2	1	2	0	4
Chauncey Gibson	G	15	1-4	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	1	3
Kade Douglas	G	11	1-5	1-4	0-0	3	1	0	0	3
Phillip Russell	Guard	27	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	7	1	0	2
Makaih Williams	G	16	1-5	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Dwayne Koroma	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Darrius Miles	Center	3	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sherman Brashear	Guard	26	5-9	4-5	1-2	5	0	0	0	15
Elijah Elliott	G	38	5-20	0-6	4-6	5	3	0	0	14
Daylen Williams	Forward	34	5-7	1-2	3-4	6	4	0	0	14
CJ Booker	PG	23	3-8	1-4	1-1	1	2	2	0	8
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	19	3-6	0-3	0-0	3	2	1	0	6
Roy Jones III	Guard	24	1-3	1-2	2-2	3	3	2	0	5
Saliou Seye	F	16	1-2	0-0	2-4	1	0	0	1	4
Alex Horiuk	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Isaiah Barganier	F	6	1-1	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	2
Fadi Mougharbel	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.8Possessions75.8

117.4Offensive Efficiency92.3

92.3Defensive Efficiency117.4

25.1Net Efficiency-25.1

57.5%Effective FG%50.0%

58.2%True Shooting %52.3%

18.3%Turnover Rate22.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate36.8%

34.3%3-Point Rate38.6%

1.36Assist / Turnover0.82

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 75.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.