Yale

23-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

87.3%Yale

12.7%Princeton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADYale -11.4

PROJECTED TOTAL143.9

MODEL MONEYLINEYale -687

Princeton

9-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreYale 78

Projected Total143.9

Projected ScorePrinceton 66

Team Comparison

YaleMetricPrinceton

65.4MMH Power Index43.5

121.4Offensive Efficiency105.1

105.8Defensive Efficiency110.3

15.6Net Efficiency-5.2

1.6Strength of Schedule1.7

8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

64.5Tempo65.2

56.8%Effective FG%50.3%

13.9%Turnover Rate16.9%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

34.4%Free Throw Rate35.0%

10.1Average Margin-3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–43.5), offensive efficiency (121.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.8–110.3), net efficiency (15.6–-5.2).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–1.6), free throw rate (35.0–34.4).

Final

Yale

62—73

Princeton

Princeton by 11 • 60.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATPrinceton

22-53FG25-52

42.0%FG%48.0%

6-183PT6-23

33.0%3PT%26.0%

12-15FT17-18

80.0%FT%94.0%

28Rebounds32

6Offensive Rebounds5

6Assists14

8Turnovers4

3Steals3

1Blocks1

20Fouls14

Player Box Score

Yale

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bez Mbeng	Guard	32	6-9	0-0	6-6	7	0	2	0	18
John Poulakidas	Guard	31	5-14	3-9	3-3	0	0	0	0	16
August Mahoney	Guard	31	5-7	2-4	1-1	1	2	0	0	13
Nick Townsend	F	34	3-7	0-1	1-2	2	2	1	0	7
Jack Molloy	Forward	10	2-4	1-2	1-1	3	0	0	0	6
Yassine Gharram	G	12	1-4	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Danny Wolf	Center	36	0-8	0-1	0-2	9	2	0	0	0
Casey Simmons	G	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Xaivian Lee	G	35	6-13	1-5	6-6	7	5	0	0	19
Matt Allocco	Guard	40	5-12	1-3	7-7	3	3	1	0	18
Caden Pierce	F	32	4-7	0-2	3-4	5	2	1	0	11
Zach Martini	Center	36	4-8	2-6	0-0	4	2	1	1	10
Blake Peters	Guard	32	3-6	1-4	1-1	8	0	0	0	8
Dalen Davis	G	13	2-5	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Jack Scott	G	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

60.9Possessions60.9

101.8Offensive Efficiency119.9

119.9Defensive Efficiency101.8

-18.1Net Efficiency18.1

47.2%Effective FG%53.8%

51.6%True Shooting %60.3%

12.9%Turnover Rate6.7%

28.3%Free Throw Rate34.6%

34.0%3-Point Rate44.2%

0.75Assist / Turnover3.50

Game Summary

Princeton won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 60.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.