Portland

15-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.8%Portland

50.2%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPepperdine -0.7

PROJECTED TOTAL154.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPepperdine -101

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePortland 77

Projected Total154.9

Projected ScorePepperdine 78

Team Comparison

PortlandMetricPepperdine

42.7MMH Power Index38.2

104.8Offensive Efficiency103.2

110.6Defensive Efficiency113.6

-5.8Net Efficiency-10.4

1.8Strength of Schedule0.7

-8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.0Tempo70.0

52.0%Effective FG%48.7%

19.3%Turnover Rate18.3%

28.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

36.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

-4.1Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Portland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPortland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.7–38.2), offensive efficiency (104.8–103.2), defensive efficiency (110.6–113.6), net efficiency (-5.8–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHball security (18.3–19.3), offensive rebounding (31.1–28.7).

Final

Portland

70—91

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 21 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PortlandTEAM STATPepperdine

25-53FG37-60

47.0%FG%62.0%

4-143PT15-24

29.0%3PT%63.0%

16-21FT2-6

76.0%FT%33.0%

25Rebounds30

6Offensive Rebounds5

9Assists21

13Turnovers10

6Steals7

2Blocks3

11Fouls14

Player Box Score

Portland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Robertson	Guard	35	8-16	3-6	4-4	7	1	1	0	23
Vukasin Masic	G	33	6-8	0-0	5-6	5	3	3	0	17
Bol Dengdit	C	31	4-9	0-1	4-8	5	0	0	0	12
Vasilije Vucinic	Center	9	3-3	0-0	3-3	1	0	0	1	9
Juanse Gorosito	G	30	3-8	1-5	0-0	1	1	2	0	7
Chris Austin	Guard	29	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Yuto Yamanouchi-Williams	F	18	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	2	0	1	0
Coleman Lemke	Forward	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Andrew Younan	SG	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Drew Stack	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Ajayi	F	37	10-16	5-6	1-2	8	2	0	0	26
Jevon Porter	F	24	9-12	0-0	0-0	2	4	0	3	18
Malik Messina-Moore	G	25	6-11	5-9	0-0	1	2	1	0	17
Ethan Anderson	Guard	22	4-5	2-2	0-0	4	4	0	0	10
Cord Stansberry	G	15	3-3	2-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	8
Houston Mallette	G	30	2-5	1-2	1-2	2	4	4	0	6
Nils Cooper	G	24	2-5	0-2	0-2	1	3	0	0	4
John Squire	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	2	0	2
Curtis Williams	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Paul Jordan	Forward	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
David Mager	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0

101.4Offensive Efficiency131.9

131.9Defensive Efficiency101.4

-30.4Net Efficiency30.4

50.9%Effective FG%74.2%

55.6%True Shooting %72.4%

18.6%Turnover Rate14.7%

39.6%Free Throw Rate10.0%

26.4%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.69Assist / Turnover2.10

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.