William & Mary logo

William & Mary

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.5%William & Mary
62.5%Charleston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL158.0
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -167
Charleston logo

Charleston

21-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 77
Projected Total158.0
Projected ScoreCharleston 81

Team Comparison

53.8MMH Power Index53.8
112.5Offensive Efficiency109.2
105.2Defensive Efficiency106.2
7.3Net Efficiency3.0
-1.5Strength of Schedule1.9
3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.9
73.9Tempo69.1
55.3%Effective FG%50.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
45.3%Free Throw Rate42.1%
5.4Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.5–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (7.3–3.0), shooting efficiency (55.3–50.6).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-1.5), recent form (3.9–3.5), ball security (15.4–16.4).
Final
William & Mary logo
William & Mary
57—65
Charleston logo
Charleston
Charleston by 8 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATCharleston
20-54FG18-55
37.0%FG%33.0%
4-203PT7-22
20.0%3PT%32.0%
13-17FT22-31
76.0%FT%71.0%
37Rebounds41
7Offensive Rebounds11
7Assists8
15Turnovers10
4Steals8
2Blocks6
21Fouls16

Player Box Score

William & Mary
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trey MossG316-101-23-441000016
Gabe DorseyGuard333-112-105-530000013
Chase LoweG265-110-02-271000012
Sean HouptGuard302-51-31-15010006
Tai HamiltonF231-30-02-46001004
Matteus CaseGuard192-50-00-03101004
Jayden LemondG101-20-00-11100002
Caleb DorseyForward160-70-50-04310000
Miles HicksG120-00-00-01020000
Charleston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Reyne SmithGuard272-62-69-910100015
Frankie PolicelliForward253-83-66-960000015
Kobe RodgersG285-80-02-251200012
Ante BrzovicForward243-110-03-412210009
Ben BurnhamForward223-81-20-02011007
Jordan CrawfordG141-51-51-21000004
James ScottF161-10-00-06014002
Bryce ButlerGuard180-30-01-53221001
Khalil LondonG160-40-20-00200000
CJ FultonGuard100-10-10-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4
82.1Offensive Efficiency93.7
93.7Defensive Efficiency82.1
-11.5Net Efficiency11.5
40.7%Effective FG%39.1%
45.9%True Shooting %46.6%
21.4%Turnover Rate14.6%
31.5%Free Throw Rate56.4%
37.0%3-Point Rate40.0%
0.47Assist / Turnover0.80
Game Summary
Charleston won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.