Grambling logo

Grambling

14-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.0%Grambling
63.0%Prairie View A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPrairie View A&M -4.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEPrairie View A&M -170
Prairie View A&M logo

Prairie View A&M

19-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 72
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 77

Team Comparison

41.4MMH Power Index41.6
100.7Offensive Efficiency105.6
100.4Defensive Efficiency103.9
0.3Net Efficiency1.7
-5.7Strength of Schedule-9.8
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
69.9Tempo73.8
49.2%Effective FG%49.2%
20.9%Turnover Rate15.9%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %27.7%
42.2%Free Throw Rate42.9%
0.2Average Margin1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Prairie View A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPrairie View A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.6–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.6–100.7), net efficiency (1.7–0.3), recent form (4.4–-0.4).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–103.9), strength of schedule (-5.7–-9.8), offensive rebounding (30.4–27.7).
Final
Grambling logo
Grambling
83—74
Prairie View A&M logo
Prairie View A&M
Grambling by 9 • 69.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATPrairie View A&M
28-48FG27-53
58.0%FG%51.0%
5-123PT6-13
42.0%3PT%46.0%
22-29FT14-20
76.0%FT%70.0%
31Rebounds20
8Offensive Rebounds5
12Assists15
14Turnovers13
7Steals6
2Blocks2
17Fouls18

Player Box Score

Grambling
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tra'Michael MotonGuard257-120-36-622300020
Antwan BurnettG376-82-35-682000019
Jonathan AkuForward245-50-02-481110012
Kintavious DozierG293-51-14-722000011
Terrence LewisGuard213-42-31-25010009
Jourdan SmithGuard312-70-03-33011007
Mikale StevensonG152-50-21-10510005
Quintin MurrellGuard90-10-00-00000000
Zahad MunfordGuard10-00-00-01000000
Prairie View A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brian MylesForward4010-161-16-8102210027
Javontae HopkinsGuard409-153-46-924100027
Charles Lane Jr.Guard233-92-60-01000008
Charles Smith IVGuard253-80-11-12500007
Orlando Horton Jr.G182-40-00-01310004
McKinley HarrisForward150-00-01-20000001
Kevin McGaskeyGuard260-00-00-02110000
Andre NunleyG110-00-00-00011000
Nick GazelasGuard20-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.2Possessions69.2
119.9Offensive Efficiency106.9
106.9Defensive Efficiency119.9
13.0Net Efficiency-13.0
63.5%Effective FG%56.6%
67.2%True Shooting %59.2%
20.7%Turnover Rate18.4%
60.4%Free Throw Rate37.7%
25.0%3-Point Rate24.5%
0.86Assist / Turnover1.15
Game Summary
Grambling won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 69.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.