Southern Utah

10-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.1%Southern Utah

81.9%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -11.4

PROJECTED TOTAL147.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -452

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouthern Utah 68

Projected Total147.1

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 79

Team Comparison

Southern UtahMetricUT Arlington

40.6MMH Power Index49.6

105.6Offensive Efficiency102.7

110.0Defensive Efficiency97.9

-4.4Net Efficiency4.8

-3.0Strength of Schedule-0.8

-3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

72.3Tempo68.1

52.6%Effective FG%48.5%

19.6%Turnover Rate20.4%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

34.4%Free Throw Rate43.7%

-3.2Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–40.6), defensive efficiency (97.9–110.0), net efficiency (4.8–-4.4), strength of schedule (-0.8–-3.0).

Southern Utah COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.6–102.7), recent form (-3.3–-3.9), shooting efficiency (52.6–48.5).

Final

Southern Utah

85—90

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 5 • 74.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Southern UtahTEAM STATUT Arlington

30-58FG32-64

52.0%FG%50.0%

9-203PT11-22

45.0%3PT%50.0%

16-22FT15-24

73.0%FT%63.0%

30Rebounds36

6Offensive Rebounds11

16Assists22

10Turnovers11

4Steals7

4Blocks3

19Fouls19

Player Box Score

Southern Utah

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dominique Ford	G	37	6-13	5-9	7-9	4	2	1	0	24
Zion Young	Guard	29	7-12	2-5	4-4	4	4	0	1	20
Parsa Fallah	F	31	9-15	0-1	1-3	6	3	0	0	19
Braden Housley	G	40	6-12	2-4	3-4	5	2	1	0	17
Jamari Sibley	Forward	27	1-4	0-1	1-2	7	3	1	1	3
Brock Felder	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2	2
Chazz Hutchison	Forward	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
Robert Jeter	Point Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Prophet Johnson	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
DaJuan Gordon	Guard	33	8-12	2-2	5-8	9	1	3	1	23
Phillip Russell	Guard	38	8-16	3-7	0-0	3	8	0	0	19
Aaron Cash	Guard	32	6-11	3-6	0-0	6	3	3	1	15
Shemar Wilson	Forward	29	3-8	0-1	2-4	10	1	1	1	8
Makaih Williams	G	17	1-7	1-2	4-4	2	2	0	0	7
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	17	2-4	1-2	1-2	0	5	0	0	6
Dwayne Koroma	F	13	3-3	0-0	0-2	2	1	0	0	6
Akili Vining	Guard	13	0-1	0-0	3-4	0	1	0	0	3
Sterling Gaston-Chapman	Guard	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Chauncey Gibson	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

74.0Possessions74.0

114.9Offensive Efficiency121.6

121.6Defensive Efficiency114.9

-6.8Net Efficiency6.8

59.5%Effective FG%58.6%

62.1%True Shooting %59.7%

13.8%Turnover Rate14.6%

37.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

34.5%3-Point Rate34.4%

1.60Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 74.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.