UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
70.6%Utah Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -7.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -240
Utah Valley logo

Utah Valley

25-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 70
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 78

Team Comparison

55.8MMH Power Index59.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency113.4
103.1Defensive Efficiency97.3
9.5Net Efficiency16.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.3
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
67.4Tempo70.6
55.7%Effective FG%56.0%
17.9%Turnover Rate19.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
29.6%Free Throw Rate37.3%
6.4Average Margin11.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–55.8), offensive efficiency (113.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (97.3–103.1), net efficiency (16.1–9.5).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.9–-3.3), recent form (12.3–6.8), ball security (17.9–19.9).
Final
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
59—70
Utah Valley logo
Utah Valley
Utah Valley by 11 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATUtah Valley
25-60FG29-64
42.0%FG%45.0%
4-163PT5-16
25.0%3PT%31.0%
5-9FT7-10
56.0%FT%70.0%
33Rebounds40
6Offensive Rebounds10
17Assists23
10Turnovers10
6Steals2
4Blocks4
13Fouls13

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Daylen WilliamsForward376-111-24-5115000017
Saliou SeyeF266-61-11-280040014
Elijah ElliottG386-150-20-025100012
Sherman BrashearGuard163-62-50-03010008
Alex HoriukF112-40-00-03100004
CJ BookerPG381-110-40-01320002
Isaiah BarganierF141-40-00-22100002
Roy Jones IIIGuard200-30-20-01220000
Utah Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ethan PotterF247-130-02-272000016
Trevin DoriusCenter267-130-01-2140120015
Jaden McClanahanGuard244-81-52-222010011
Tanner ToolsonG244-82-40-034000010
Osiris GradyF203-30-00-00100006
Caleb Stone-CarrawellForward192-91-40-03100005
K'mani DoughtyGuard111-21-12-21200005
Nate TshimangaForward101-20-00-02010002
Drake AllenG310-40-10-251101000
Trevan LeonhardtG100-20-10-03000000
Cache FieldsGuard10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6
86.0Offensive Efficiency102.0
102.0Defensive Efficiency86.0
-16.0Net Efficiency16.0
45.0%Effective FG%49.2%
45.9%True Shooting %50.9%
14.6%Turnover Rate14.5%
15.0%Free Throw Rate15.6%
26.7%3-Point Rate25.0%
1.70Assist / Turnover2.30
Game Summary
Utah Valley won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.