UT Martin

22-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%UT Martin

54.4%Lindenwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLindenwood -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL141.5

MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -119

Lindenwood

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Martin 70

Projected Total141.5

Projected ScoreLindenwood 72

Team Comparison

UT MartinMetricLindenwood

49.8MMH Power Index46.8

103.8Offensive Efficiency105.5

94.0Defensive Efficiency98.6

9.8Net Efficiency6.9

-4.8Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4

67.2Tempo73.7

49.5%Effective FG%50.2%

21.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

37.9%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

37.5%Free Throw Rate37.9%

6.6Average Margin5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–46.8), defensive efficiency (94.0–98.6), net efficiency (9.8–6.9), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.5–103.8), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.5), ball security (18.3–21.4).

Final

UT Martin

106—82

Lindenwood

UT Martin by 24 • 77.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATLindenwood

39-61FG33-73

64.0%FG%45.0%

12-253PT9-27

48.0%3PT%33.0%

16-19FT7-13

84.0%FT%54.0%

41Rebounds25

4Offensive Rebounds6

17Assists12

11Turnovers5

4Steals6

2Blocks1

11Fouls16

Player Box Score

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Sears	Guard	39	11-18	7-11	8-8	9	9	0	0	37
Jacob Crews	G	37	9-14	3-8	7-8	12	0	2	2	28
Issa Muhammad	Forward	32	5-11	0-0	0-0	8	1	0	0	10
Sebastian Mendoza	Guard	26	4-6	1-3	0-0	2	3	0	0	9
KK Curry	Forward	17	4-4	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	0	9
Koby Jeffries	Guard	22	4-4	0-0	0-0	3	3	1	0	8
Desmond Williams	Guard	19	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
David Kamwanga	Forward	8	1-1	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	0	2

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keenon Cole	Forward	33	5-14	2-5	5-7	3	1	0	0	17
Darius Beane	Guard	33	6-12	0-1	1-1	4	6	1	0	13
Jeremiah Talton	F	27	5-9	2-5	0-0	5	0	1	1	12
Colin Ruffin	G	21	5-7	1-3	0-1	4	2	1	0	11
Jaylon McDaniel	F	25	5-12	0-0	0-2	3	0	2	0	10
Nathan Johnson Jr.	Guard	25	3-7	1-3	1-2	0	1	1	0	8
Tommie Williams	Guard	21	3-5	2-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	8
Keith Haymon II	Forward	14	1-5	1-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
RJ Horry	Guard	1	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.6Possessions77.6

136.6Offensive Efficiency105.7

105.7Defensive Efficiency136.6

30.9Net Efficiency-30.9

73.8%Effective FG%51.4%

75.7%True Shooting %51.8%

14.3%Turnover Rate6.4%

31.1%Free Throw Rate17.8%

41.0%3-Point Rate37.0%

1.55Assist / Turnover2.40

Game Summary

UT Martin won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 77.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.