Notre Dame

13-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

31.3%Notre Dame

68.7%Syracuse

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSyracuse -6.3

PROJECTED TOTAL151.7

MODEL MONEYLINESyracuse -219

Syracuse

15-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 73

Projected Total151.7

Projected ScoreSyracuse 79

Team Comparison

Notre DameMetricSyracuse

49.7MMH Power Index52.2

110.3Offensive Efficiency109.2

111.2Defensive Efficiency106.6

-0.9Net Efficiency2.6

4.7Strength of Schedule5.6

-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1

68.0Tempo69.0

53.0%Effective FG%52.9%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %29.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate36.2%

-0.6Average Margin1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Syracuse HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSyracuse holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–49.7), defensive efficiency (106.6–111.2), net efficiency (2.6–-0.9), strength of schedule (5.6–4.7).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.3–109.2), recent form (-11.6–-15.1), shooting efficiency (53.0–52.9).

Final

Notre Dame

85—88

Syracuse

Syracuse by 3 • 69.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATSyracuse

32-52FG34-64

62.0%FG%53.0%

12-213PT7-16

57.0%3PT%44.0%

9-12FT13-18

75.0%FT%72.0%

30Rebounds25

6Offensive Rebounds9

16Assists17

17Turnovers7

4Steals10

—Blocks4

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Markus Burton	G	38	10-20	2-6	6-7	3	8	1	28
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	36	6-9	6-9	0-0	3	0	0	18
Tae Davis	F	34	5-8	1-1	1-3	7	5	1	12
Carey Booth	F	33	4-7	1-3	0-0	4	0	1	9
Julian Roper II	Guard	24	3-3	2-2	0-0	7	1	1	8
Kebba Njie	F	17	3-3	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	8
J.R. Konieczny	F	7	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Logan Imes	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0
Matt Zona	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Syracuse

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Judah Mintz	Guard	33	7-14	1-3	6-7	3	3	3	0	21
Chris Bell	F	37	6-8	4-5	2-2	4	1	1	2	18
J.J. Starling	G	37	6-17	2-7	0-0	3	1	2	0	14
Maliq Brown	F	35	6-9	0-0	2-4	7	5	1	2	14
Justin Taylor	G	21	4-4	0-0	2-2	0	1	0	0	10
Quadir Copeland	G	17	3-9	0-0	1-2	4	5	2	0	7
Kyle Cuffe Jr.	G	14	2-3	0-1	0-1	0	1	0	0	4
Peter Carey	Center	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.7Possessions69.7

122.0Offensive Efficiency126.3

126.3Defensive Efficiency122.0

-4.3Net Efficiency4.3

73.1%Effective FG%58.6%

73.7%True Shooting %60.6%

24.7%Turnover Rate9.9%

23.1%Free Throw Rate28.1%

40.4%3-Point Rate25.0%

0.94Assist / Turnover2.43

Game Summary

Syracuse won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 69.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.