East Tennessee State

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.5%East Tennessee State

53.5%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -0.6

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -115

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Tennessee State 76

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreSamford 77

Team Comparison

East Tennessee StateMetricSamford

57.4MMH Power Index54.1

115.1Offensive Efficiency113.5

102.8Defensive Efficiency108.3

12.3Net Efficiency5.2

-1.6Strength of Schedule-2.9

3.7Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

67.4Tempo69.5

55.4%Effective FG%54.0%

15.1%Turnover Rate13.3%

28.8%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

35.0%Free Throw Rate42.5%

8.3Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

East Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMEast Tennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.4–54.1), offensive efficiency (115.1–113.5), defensive efficiency (102.8–108.3), net efficiency (12.3–5.2).

Samford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (14.0–3.7), ball security (13.3–15.1), free throw rate (42.5–35.0).

Final

East Tennessee State

71—87

Samford

Samford by 16 • 72.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Tennessee StateTEAM STATSamford

25-62FG31-58

40.0%FG%53.0%

10-253PT13-34

40.0%3PT%38.0%

11-23FT12-18

48.0%FT%67.0%

39Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds6

16Assists17

15Turnovers12

8Steals10

3Blocks6

14Fouls16

Player Box Score

East Tennessee State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ebby Asamoah	Guard	30	6-15	5-11	2-2	5	1	0	0	19
Jaden Seymour	Forward	31	5-12	1-3	6-10	4	0	2	0	17
Jadyn Parker	Forward	32	3-8	0-0	2-9	12	1	2	3	8
Maki Johnson	G	16	3-5	2-4	0-0	1	1	1	0	8
Quimari Peterson	G	35	3-12	0-5	1-2	5	8	2	0	7
Karon Boyd	F	29	2-5	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	0	4
Allen Strothers	G	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	4	1	0	3
Gabe Sisk	G	5	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
DJ Hughes	Forward	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Campbell	Guard	31	9-14	5-9	5-5	4	0	0	1	28
Rylan Jones	Guard	28	6-9	4-7	3-4	2	5	5	0	19
Garrett Hicks	Guard	22	6-9	2-4	0-0	3	2	3	0	14
Jermaine Marshall	Forward	20	4-9	1-5	1-3	5	2	1	1	10
Riley Allenspach	F	23	2-4	0-1	1-2	5	1	0	1	5
Nathan Johnson	Forward	23	1-6	0-4	2-4	2	2	0	1	4
Josh Holloway	G	8	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	3	0	0	3
Dallas Graziani	Guard	19	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
Lukas Walls	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Zach Loveday	Center	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	2	0
Chandler Leopard	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joshua Hughes	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Grayson Walters	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Paulie Stramaglia	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Owen LaRocca	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.8Possessions72.8

97.5Offensive Efficiency119.5

119.5Defensive Efficiency97.5

-22.0Net Efficiency22.0

48.4%Effective FG%64.7%

48.7%True Shooting %65.4%

20.6%Turnover Rate16.5%

37.1%Free Throw Rate31.0%

40.3%3-Point Rate58.6%

1.07Assist / Turnover1.42

Game Summary

Samford won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 72.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.