
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.5%UT Rio Grande Valley
50.5%Seattle U
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeattle U -1.5
PROJECTED TOTAL142.6
MODEL MONEYLINESeattle U -102

Seattle U
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 71
Projected Total142.6
Projected ScoreSeattle U 72
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index51.4
112.6Offensive Efficiency103.9
103.1Defensive Efficiency96.9
9.5Net Efficiency7.0
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.7
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.1
67.4Tempo69.4
55.7%Effective FG%50.8%
17.9%Turnover Rate16.6%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %25.1%
29.6%Free Throw Rate35.2%
6.4Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–51.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–103.9), net efficiency (9.5–7.0), recent form (12.3–4.1).
Seattle U COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (96.9–103.1), strength of schedule (-1.7–-1.9), ball security (16.6–17.9).