Wright State logo

Wright State

23-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.8%Wright State
50.2%Oakland
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOakland -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL163.5
MODEL MONEYLINEOakland -101
Oakland logo

Oakland

16-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWright State 82
Projected Total163.5
Projected ScoreOakland 82

Team Comparison

57.1MMH Power Index52.6
116.4Offensive Efficiency115.7
106.5Defensive Efficiency114.5
9.9Net Efficiency1.2
-2.0Strength of Schedule2.1
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4
69.2Tempo71.4
55.2%Effective FG%53.3%
16.1%Turnover Rate14.7%
33.9%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
38.3%Free Throw Rate38.5%
6.8Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wright State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWright State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–52.6), offensive efficiency (116.4–115.7), defensive efficiency (106.5–114.5), net efficiency (9.9–1.2).
Oakland COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.1–-2.0), ball security (14.7–16.1), free throw rate (38.5–38.3).
Final
Wright State logo
Wright State
96—75
Oakland logo
Oakland
Wright State by 21 • 76.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wright StateTEAM STATOakland
37-66FG27-65
56.0%FG%42.0%
9-193PT9-29
47.0%3PT%31.0%
13-18FT12-17
72.0%FT%71.0%
38Rebounds36
8Offensive Rebounds11
22Assists15
9Turnovers15
10Steals5
3Blocks2
15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Wright State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alex HuibregtseG318-125-90-116100021
AJ BraunForward3310-150-00-050120020
Brandon NoelF376-121-36-6162010019
Tanner HoldenGuard337-120-01-568300015
Trey CalvinGuard384-71-22-254200011
Bo MyersGuard21-11-12-21000005
Logan WoodsG91-31-30-00120003
Drey CarterF80-10-02-20110002
Andrew WelageGuard70-00-00-02000000
Kaden BrownG20-30-10-00000000
Oakland
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
DQ ColeGuard318-161-61-425000018
Trey TownsendForward365-110-24-4142100014
Blake LampmanGuard305-114-100-021000014
Chris ConwayForward304-110-05-524120013
Jack GohlkeGuard364-114-110-140000012
Isaiah JonesF140-10-02-25010002
Michael RogersGuard11-10-00-10000002
Tone HunterGuard70-10-00-00120000
Osei PriceGuard60-00-00-01100000
Rocket WattsGuard50-00-00-00100000
Tuburu NaivaluruaF40-20-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

76.4Possessions76.4
125.7Offensive Efficiency98.2
98.2Defensive Efficiency125.7
27.5Net Efficiency-27.5
62.9%Effective FG%48.5%
64.4%True Shooting %51.3%
11.9%Turnover Rate19.5%
27.3%Free Throw Rate26.2%
28.8%3-Point Rate44.6%
2.44Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Wright State won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 76.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.