UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.0%UAB

29.0%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -245

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 79

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreTulane 74

Team Comparison

UABMetricTulane

56.9MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

102.9Defensive Efficiency109.9

7.6Net Efficiency-4.6

0.4Strength of Schedule2.7

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.7Tempo68.7

48.8%Effective FG%49.6%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

5.4Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.9), net efficiency (7.6–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.8), free throw rate (44.8–36.9).

Final

UAB

78—67

Tulane

UAB by 11 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTulane

30-56FG24-57

54.0%FG%42.0%

5-183PT8-20

28.0%3PT%40.0%

13-18FT11-19

72.0%FT%58.0%

39Rebounds24

9Offensive Rebounds6

21Assists15

14Turnovers11

7Steals7

5Blocks3

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	35	10-13	0-0	6-8	12	3	1	3	26
Butta Johnson	G	37	5-8	3-6	0-0	5	5	0	1	13
Javian Davis	Forward	24	4-6	0-0	2-4	6	2	2	0	10
Christian Coleman	G	22	5-9	0-0	0-0	4	2	0	0	10
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	22	2-7	2-7	1-2	2	1	1	0	7
Eric Gaines	Guard	26	1-5	0-2	4-4	4	5	1	1	6
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	15	2-5	0-2	0-0	3	2	0	0	4
Tony Toney	Guard	19	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	0	2

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevin Cross, Jr.	Forward	37	7-14	2-3	2-3	3	4	0	0	18
Sion James	Guard	29	4-6	1-2	4-6	5	3	1	0	13
Jaylen Forbes	Guard	39	4-12	2-7	0-0	5	2	0	0	10
Kolby King	G	25	3-7	2-4	0-2	0	4	1	0	8
Tre' Williams	Guard	30	2-9	1-2	1-2	3	2	4	0	6
Percy Daniels	C	17	2-4	0-0	2-4	1	0	1	2	6
Collin Holloway	Forward	18	1-3	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
Gregg Glenn III	F	5	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3

111.0Offensive Efficiency95.3

95.3Defensive Efficiency111.0

15.6Net Efficiency-15.6

58.0%Effective FG%49.1%

60.4%True Shooting %50.7%

20.1%Turnover Rate15.5%

32.1%Free Throw Rate33.3%

32.1%3-Point Rate35.1%

1.50Assist / Turnover1.36

Game Summary

UAB won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.