
Buffalo
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Buffalo
74.4%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -8.0
PROJECTED TOTAL163.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -291

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBuffalo 78
Projected Total163.4
Projected ScoreKent State 86
Team Comparison
49.7MMH Power Index54.7
114.9Offensive Efficiency113.9
112.2Defensive Efficiency107.6
2.7Net Efficiency6.3
0.0Strength of Schedule-0.1
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
67.9Tempo74.0
56.1%Effective FG%53.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
40.4%Free Throw Rate43.5%
1.8Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (107.6–112.2), net efficiency (6.3–2.7), recent form (2.1–-5.9).
Buffalo COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.9–113.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.1), shooting efficiency (56.1–53.0).