Buffalo logo

Buffalo

17-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Buffalo
74.4%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -8.0
PROJECTED TOTAL163.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -291
Kent State logo

Kent State

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBuffalo 78
Projected Total163.4
Projected ScoreKent State 86

Team Comparison

49.7MMH Power Index54.7
114.9Offensive Efficiency113.9
112.2Defensive Efficiency107.6
2.7Net Efficiency6.3
0.0Strength of Schedule-0.1
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
67.9Tempo74.0
56.1%Effective FG%53.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.7%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
40.4%Free Throw Rate43.5%
1.8Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Kent State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (107.6–112.2), net efficiency (6.3–2.7), recent form (2.1–-5.9).
Buffalo COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.9–113.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.1), shooting efficiency (56.1–53.0).
Final
Buffalo logo
Buffalo
64—76
Kent State logo
Kent State
Kent State by 12 • 69.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BuffaloTEAM STATKent State
23-50FG30-66
46.0%FG%45.0%
6-133PT10-25
46.0%3PT%40.0%
12-14FT6-7
86.0%FT%86.0%
33Rebounds30
6Offensive Rebounds8
14Assists15
18Turnovers8
5Steals8
3Blocks—
9Fouls14

Player Box Score

Buffalo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Isaiah AdamsGuard288-123-40-022000019
Jonnivius SmithForward223-50-14-4101000010
Ryan SabolG333-52-40-01300008
Bryson WilsonG112-60-14-44010008
Shawn FulcherGuard302-60-13-44520007
Sy ChatmanForward322-100-11-21112005
Zaakir WilliamsonF142-40-00-05000004
Lloyd McVeighGuard151-21-10-03210003
Anquan Boldin Jr.G90-00-00-02001000
James Graham IIIG60-00-00-00000000
Kent State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen SullingerGuard3311-218-130-011100030
VonCameron DavisForward258-140-31-140200017
Magnus EntenmannF213-50-04-461100010
Chris Payton Jr.Forward194-101-10-07110009
Reggie BassGuard161-30-11-20410003
Tyem FreemanGuard71-21-20-00000003
Giovanni SantiagoGuard331-50-20-03700002
Julius RollinsG161-30-10-01000002
Mike BekeljaGuard250-10-00-04120000
Donovan HunterF40-20-20-00000000
LA HayesG10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.0Possessions69.0
92.8Offensive Efficiency110.1
110.1Defensive Efficiency92.8
-17.4Net Efficiency17.4
52.0%Effective FG%53.0%
56.5%True Shooting %54.8%
26.2%Turnover Rate11.5%
28.0%Free Throw Rate10.6%
26.0%3-Point Rate37.9%
0.78Assist / Turnover1.88
Game Summary
Kent State won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 69.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.