Wake Forest

18-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

59.2%Wake Forest

40.8%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWake Forest -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL156.1

MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -145

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWake Forest 79

Projected Total156.1

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 78

Team Comparison

Wake ForestMetricNotre Dame

57.6MMH Power Index49.7

112.4Offensive Efficiency110.3

109.7Defensive Efficiency111.2

2.7Net Efficiency-0.9

7.2Strength of Schedule4.7

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

70.2Tempo68.0

52.8%Effective FG%53.0%

15.5%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

36.1%Free Throw Rate34.7%

1.9Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wake Forest HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWake Forest holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–49.7), offensive efficiency (112.4–110.3), defensive efficiency (109.7–111.2), net efficiency (2.7–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.0–52.8), offensive rebounding (31.4–30.0).

Final

Wake Forest

65—70

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 5 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wake ForestTEAM STATNotre Dame

25-59FG22-58

42.0%FG%38.0%

7-233PT7-28

30.0%3PT%25.0%

8-10FT19-22

80.0%FT%86.0%

38Rebounds33

10Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists8

12Turnovers6

3Steals7

5Blocks4

18Fouls16

Player Box Score

Wake Forest

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Boopie Miller	G	39	7-16	1-5	1-2	3	5	1	0	16
Cameron Hildreth	Guard	33	6-12	2-5	1-1	8	0	1	0	15
Andrew Carr	Forward	35	5-9	2-3	0-0	4	1	0	2	12
Efton Reid III	Forward	30	4-5	0-0	4-5	10	1	1	1	12
Hunter Sallis	Guard	38	2-11	1-5	2-2	5	4	0	1	7
Damari Monsanto	Guard	5	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Matthew Marsh	Center	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Parker Friedrichsen	G	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	36	9-15	2-6	11-11	3	3	4	1	31
Carey Booth	F	34	4-13	3-9	4-5	5	2	0	2	15
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	35	3-13	2-9	3-4	4	1	1	0	11
Tae Davis	F	23	5-10	0-2	1-2	6	0	0	0	11
Kebba Njie	F	25	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	1	2
Logan Imes	G	20	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Matt Zona	Forward	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	6	0	0	0	0
Julian Roper II	Guard	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

98.9Offensive Efficiency106.5

106.5Defensive Efficiency98.9

-7.6Net Efficiency7.6

48.3%Effective FG%44.0%

51.0%True Shooting %51.1%

18.3%Turnover Rate9.2%

16.9%Free Throw Rate37.9%

39.0%3-Point Rate48.3%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.