
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
77.0%Merrimack
23.0%Fairleigh Dickinson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL134.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -335

Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 70
Projected Total134.7
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 64
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index38.3
106.4Offensive Efficiency103.8
103.2Defensive Efficiency108.4
3.2Net Efficiency-4.6
0.7Strength of Schedule-5.8
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
64.4Tempo64.7
49.3%Effective FG%48.6%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.2%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
39.5%Free Throw Rate33.1%
2.1Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–38.3), offensive efficiency (106.4–103.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.4), net efficiency (3.2–-4.6).
Fairleigh Dickinson COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.6–24.7).