UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.6%UMBC
14.4%NJIT
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL139.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -594
NJIT logo

NJIT

16-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 75
Projected Total139.0
Projected ScoreNJIT 64

Team Comparison

UMBCMetricNJIT
59.1MMH Power Index38.5
113.0Offensive Efficiency98.1
99.0Defensive Efficiency107.2
14.0Net Efficiency-9.1
-5.6Strength of Schedule-0.5
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.8
65.5Tempo68.3
54.3%Effective FG%47.0%
14.3%Turnover Rate16.9%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
34.1%Free Throw Rate34.0%
9.1Average Margin-6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–38.5), offensive efficiency (113.0–98.1), defensive efficiency (99.0–107.2), net efficiency (14.0–-9.1).
NJIT COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.5–-5.6), offensive rebounding (26.9–25.2).
Final
UMBC logo
UMBC
79—60
NJIT logo
NJIT
UMBC by 19 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATNJIT
28-60FG20-70
47.0%FG%29.0%
4-193PT5-29
21.0%3PT%17.0%
19-22FT15-21
86.0%FT%71.0%
44Rebounds42
7Offensive Rebounds15
14Assists8
9Turnovers6
5Steals8
5Blocks1
16Fouls19

Player Box Score

UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Marcus Banks Jr.G374-140-610-1294010018
Khydarius SmithCenter227-90-04-441020018
Dion BrownG347-141-50-082200015
Ace ValentineG314-72-30-062010010
Regimantas CiunysF303-50-13-47210009
Franck EmmouG151-31-22-21300005
Devan SappGuard121-40-10-01010002
Alpha ChibambeForward61-20-10-00000002
Max Lorca-LloydCenter130-20-00-02011000
NJIT
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tariq FrancisG327-184-104-552200022
Elijah BuchananGuard354-140-13-383100011
Adam HessGuard285-111-30-061100011
Levi LawalF352-60-05-710021009
Mekhi GrayG361-60-53-63210005
Jeffrey AkintoluF101-30-20-02000002
Justin AndersonGuard110-50-40-02010000
Sebastian RobinsonG110-60-30-01000000
Jake GoldbergGuard20-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8
110.0Offensive Efficiency83.6
83.6Defensive Efficiency110.0
26.5Net Efficiency-26.5
50.0%Effective FG%32.1%
56.1%True Shooting %37.5%
12.4%Turnover Rate8.5%
36.7%Free Throw Rate30.0%
31.7%3-Point Rate41.4%
1.56Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
UMBC won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.