
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
72.2%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -6.8
PROJECTED TOTAL145.7
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -260

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 69
Projected Total145.7
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 76
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index59.8
112.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
103.1Defensive Efficiency99.1
9.5Net Efficiency10.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule2.0
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
67.4Tempo69.3
55.7%Effective FG%52.1%
17.9%Turnover Rate17.6%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
29.6%Free Throw Rate41.0%
6.4Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–55.8), defensive efficiency (99.1–103.1), net efficiency (10.1–9.5), strength of schedule (2.0–-1.9).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), recent form (12.3–9.7), shooting efficiency (55.7–52.1).