Manhattan logo

Manhattan

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.7%Manhattan
89.3%Siena
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSiena -15.1
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINESiena -835
Siena logo

Siena

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreManhattan 65
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScoreSiena 80

Team Comparison

39.3MMH Power Index53.8
107.1Offensive Efficiency109.2
114.2Defensive Efficiency102.2
-7.1Net Efficiency7.0
-3.6Strength of Schedule-0.5
-3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.0
69.1Tempo64.4
48.5%Effective FG%50.7%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.8%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
34.8%Free Throw Rate34.9%
-4.9Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Siena HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSiena holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–39.3), offensive efficiency (109.2–107.1), defensive efficiency (102.2–114.2), net efficiency (7.0–-7.1).
Manhattan COUNTERS WITHball security (15.4–15.8).
Final
Manhattan logo
Manhattan
70—68
Siena logo
Siena
Manhattan by 2 • 63.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ManhattanTEAM STATSiena
27-59FG24-56
46.0%FG%43.0%
7-193PT5-14
37.0%3PT%36.0%
9-14FT15-19
64.0%FT%79.0%
26Rebounds44
6Offensive Rebounds14
12Assists11
5Turnovers12
4Steals1
3Blocks5
13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Manhattan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Perry CowanGuard345-75-64-610000019
DeJuan ClaytonGuard406-150-41-355000013
Jaden WinstonG405-110-20-174400010
Daniel RouzanF305-100-00-042020010
Seydou TraoreG242-81-42-24000007
Wesley RobinsonGuard102-40-02-21100006
Xinyi LiF81-21-20-00001003
Logan PadgettGuard141-20-10-02000002
Siena
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Giovanni EmejuruC3411-180-08-1093020030
Mason CourtneyGuard394-131-51-278110010
Sveinn BirgissonForward132-42-22-22000008
Kyle WintersGuard323-71-10-02000007
Bralyn SmithGuard212-41-12-24000007
Brendan CoyleG161-20-12-37000004
Michael OjoForward281-70-40-04000002
Killian GribbenF170-10-00-06002000

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
109.5Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.4Defensive Efficiency109.5
3.1Net Efficiency-3.1
51.7%Effective FG%47.3%
53.3%True Shooting %52.3%
7.7%Turnover Rate19.0%
23.7%Free Throw Rate33.9%
32.2%3-Point Rate25.0%
2.40Assist / Turnover0.92
Game Summary
Manhattan won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.