Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.7%Quinnipiac

51.3%Iona

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADIona -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL148.4

MODEL MONEYLINEIona -105

Iona

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 74

Projected Total148.4

Projected ScoreIona 75

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricIona

51MMH Power Index46.9

106.8Offensive Efficiency105.8

102.1Defensive Efficiency104.8

4.7Net Efficiency1.0

-2.3Strength of Schedule-1.6

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

70.5Tempo69.8

48.9%Effective FG%51.9%

15.6%Turnover Rate17.2%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %27.4%

34.1%Free Throw Rate29.9%

3.4Average Margin0.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–46.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–105.8), defensive efficiency (102.1–104.8), net efficiency (4.7–1.0).

Iona COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.6–-2.3), shooting efficiency (51.9–48.9).

Final

Quinnipiac

82—64

Iona

Quinnipiac by 18 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATIona

33-66FG23-63

50.0%FG%37.0%

7-203PT8-25

35.0%3PT%32.0%

9-9FT10-18

100.0%FT%56.0%

44Rebounds30

14Offensive Rebounds12

20Assists12

11Turnovers6

3Steals4

6Blocks5

18Fouls13

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Alexis Reyes	Forward	33	6-10	1-4	0-0	8	5	0	1	13
Matt Balanc	Guard	28	5-12	1-3	0-0	3	2	0	1	11
Rihards Vavers	F	17	4-10	1-5	2-2	3	1	0	0	11
Amarri Monroe	F	20	3-6	0-0	4-4	6	0	2	0	10
Savion Lewis	Guard	38	4-7	1-2	0-0	6	12	0	0	9
Richie Springs	Forward	10	4-5	0-0	1-1	3	0	0	3	9
Paul Otieno	F	22	3-7	0-0	2-2	4	0	0	0	8
Daemar Kelly	G	22	3-5	2-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	8
Doug Young	G	10	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	1	3

Iona

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joel Brown	Guard	29	6-14	1-2	4-8	1	0	0	1	17
Idan Tretout	Guard	33	5-9	2-4	2-2	2	3	1	2	14
Jeremiah Quigley	G	38	5-15	0-5	0-2	5	4	2	0	10
Wheza Panzo	Guard	32	3-9	3-7	0-0	4	3	1	0	9
Jean Aranguren	G	24	2-8	1-4	4-6	8	1	0	0	9
Osborn Shema	Forward	15	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Sully Adewale	F	20	1-3	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	2	2
Alex Bates IV	Guard	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Isaac Brice	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

123.5Offensive Efficiency96.4

96.4Defensive Efficiency123.5

27.1Net Efficiency-27.1

55.3%Effective FG%42.9%

58.3%True Shooting %44.7%

16.4%Turnover Rate9.2%

13.6%Free Throw Rate28.6%

30.3%3-Point Rate39.7%

1.82Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.