UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.7%UTSA
98.3%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -27.2
PROJECTED TOTAL159.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -5782
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTSA 66
Projected Total159.6
Projected ScoreSMU 93

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricSMU
30.5MMH Power Index62.5
99.0Offensive Efficiency118.2
115.0Defensive Efficiency109.6
-16.0Net Efficiency8.6
-1.2Strength of Schedule7.0
-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
70.2Tempo71.1
45.9%Effective FG%55.7%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.7%
30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
29.9%Free Throw Rate31.3%
-11.3Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–30.5), offensive efficiency (118.2–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.6–115.0), net efficiency (8.6–-16.0).
Final
UTSA logo
UTSA
77—73
SMU logo
SMU
UTSA by 4 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATSMU
28-64FG28-73
44.0%FG%38.0%
12-283PT9-29
43.0%3PT%31.0%
9-11FT8-12
82.0%FT%67.0%
39Rebounds42
11Offensive Rebounds17
19Assists11
12Turnovers10
4Steals8
6Blocks5
13Fouls10

Player Box Score

UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan Ivy-CurryGuard3212-225-94-431010033
PJ CarterG288-155-92-243100023
Dre Fuller Jr.Guard245-72-31-161220013
Trey EdmondsCenter262-50-00-26010004
Chandler CuthrellF201-20-12-211301004
Christian TuckerGuard350-50-10-01901000
Carlton Linguard Jr.Center170-40-30-00100000
Massal DioufForward100-20-00-02001000
Isaiah WyattGuard80-20-20-02100000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zhuric PhelpsGuard307-181-63-511100018
Jalen SmithG276-122-61-153010015
Ricardo WrightGuard305-163-110-052200013
Ja'Heim HudsonForward223-62-32-221010010
Tyreek SmithNot Available183-60-01-27112007
Samuell WilliamsonForward211-40-01-28110003
Emory LanierGuard181-21-20-03110003
Keon Ambrose-HyltonForward171-30-00-03001002
B.J. EdwardsG161-60-10-02120002
Mo NjieC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0
108.5Offensive Efficiency102.8
102.8Defensive Efficiency108.5
5.6Net Efficiency-5.6
53.1%Effective FG%44.5%
55.6%True Shooting %46.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate13.9%
17.2%Free Throw Rate16.4%
43.8%3-Point Rate39.7%
1.58Assist / Turnover1.10
Game Summary
UTSA won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.