LSU

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.5%LSU

89.5%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -14.7

PROJECTED TOTAL164.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -852

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLSU 75

Projected Total164.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 90

Team Comparison

LSUMetricVanderbilt

54.2MMH Power Index68.9

115.5Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.3Defensive Efficiency105.7

4.2Net Efficiency15.2

4.5Strength of Schedule7.4

-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

70.5Tempo70.9

53.4%Effective FG%55.3%

15.6%Turnover Rate13.5%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

41.9%Free Throw Rate39.3%

2.9Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–54.2), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.5), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.3), net efficiency (15.2–4.2).

LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–30.8), free throw rate (41.9–39.3).

Final

LSU

75—61

Vanderbilt

LSU by 14 • 63.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATVanderbilt

25-57FG20-55

44.0%FG%36.0%

10-313PT3-21

32.0%3PT%14.0%

15-19FT18-25

79.0%FT%72.0%

41Rebounds29

14Offensive Rebounds10

12Assists7

11Turnovers6

1Steals4

1Blocks2

19Fouls19

Player Box Score

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Wright	Guard	34	5-8	1-4	4-4	7	1	0	1	15
Jalen Reed	F	22	4-6	1-1	4-6	6	1	0	0	13
Tyrell Ward	G	27	4-13	2-10	0-0	5	1	1	0	10
Will Baker	Forward	23	4-12	2-5	0-0	3	2	0	0	10
Mike Williams III	G	22	3-6	2-5	2-2	1	1	0	0	10
Hunter Dean	Forward	17	2-3	0-1	4-5	5	0	0	0	8
Derek Fountain	Forward	18	2-6	1-4	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Mwani Wilkinson	Guard	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Trae Hannibal	Guard	33	0-2	0-0	1-2	7	6	0	0	1

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyrin Lawrence	Guard	37	7-15	2-6	5-10	4	0	2	0	21
Ezra Manjon	Guard	37	5-8	1-1	6-7	3	2	0	0	17
Ven-Allen Lubin	F	33	3-7	0-0	2-3	2	1	0	1	8
Evan Taylor	Guard	21	2-9	0-3	1-1	4	0	0	1	5
Malik Presley	G	6	1-3	0-2	2-2	0	0	0	0	4
JaQualon Roberts	F	20	1-4	0-2	0-0	4	2	0	0	2
Paul Lewis	G	14	1-4	0-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	2
Isaiah West	G	5	0-1	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Jordan Williams	G	15	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.0Possessions63.0

119.0Offensive Efficiency96.8

96.8Defensive Efficiency119.0

22.2Net Efficiency-22.2

52.6%Effective FG%39.1%

56.8%True Shooting %45.6%

17.5%Turnover Rate9.5%

33.3%Free Throw Rate45.5%

54.4%3-Point Rate38.2%

1.09Assist / Turnover1.17

Game Summary

LSU won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 63.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.