High Point

31-5

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

87.5%High Point

12.5%Longwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -12.4

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -700

Longwood

16-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHigh Point 86

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreLongwood 74

Team Comparison

High PointMetricLongwood

69MMH Power Index47

123.8Offensive Efficiency108.1

98.3Defensive Efficiency103.0

25.5Net Efficiency5.1

-5.8Strength of Schedule-6.4

16.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3

72.4Tempo71.9

56.6%Effective FG%51.4%

12.8%Turnover Rate19.3%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %35.4%

42.4%Free Throw Rate42.0%

18.5Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–47.0), offensive efficiency (123.8–108.1), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.0), net efficiency (25.5–5.1).

Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.4–33.2).

Final

High Point

72—74

Longwood

Longwood by 2 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

High PointTEAM STATLongwood

21-51FG26-59

41.0%FG%44.0%

10-283PT4-12

36.0%3PT%33.0%

20-27FT18-24

74.0%FT%75.0%

31Rebounds41

9Offensive Rebounds15

9Assists10

15Turnovers16

9Steals6

3Blocks—

21Fouls23

Player Box Score

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	34	7-15	4-10	3-3	3	1	1	0	21
Duke Miles	G	36	6-12	3-6	3-4	4	3	2	0	18
Kezza Giffa	G	23	4-13	2-7	5-6	3	1	2	0	15
Kimani Hamilton	F	38	2-6	0-2	8-10	6	3	2	0	12
Trae Benham	Guard	22	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	25	1-2	0-0	0-2	8	0	2	3	2
Pavlo Dziuba	Forward	8	0-0	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	1
Denzel Hines	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Titas Sargiunas	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Johnathan Massie	Guard	22	5-6	1-1	5-6	5	0	1	16
D'Avian Houston	G	28	3-9	1-4	8-8	5	2	1	15
Walyn Napper	Guard	36	6-18	1-4	0-1	4	6	0	13
Szymon Zapala	Center	17	6-7	0-0	1-2	9	1	0	13
Johan Nziemi	F	9	1-3	0-0	4-4	3	1	2	6
Emanuel Richards	G	20	2-3	0-1	0-0	5	0	1	4
Elijah Tucker	F	13	2-5	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	4
Michael Christmas	Forward	30	1-7	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	3
Jesper Granlund	Forward	24	0-1	0-0	0-3	1	0	0	0
Saxby Sunderland	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6

102.0Offensive Efficiency104.8

104.8Defensive Efficiency102.0

-2.8Net Efficiency2.8

51.0%Effective FG%47.5%

56.4%True Shooting %52.6%

21.5%Turnover Rate22.4%

52.9%Free Throw Rate40.7%

54.9%3-Point Rate20.3%

0.60Assist / Turnover0.63

Game Summary

Longwood won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.