Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

32.5%Florida A&M

67.5%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -208

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricGrambling

39.4MMH Power Index41.4

98.7Offensive Efficiency100.7

105.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-6.9Net Efficiency0.3

-3.2Strength of Schedule-5.7

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

70.6Tempo69.9

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

21.6%Turnover Rate20.9%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

38.0%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-4.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Florida A&M

68—75

Grambling

Grambling by 7 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATGrambling

26-58FG30-55

45.0%FG%55.0%

3-113PT4-15

27.0%3PT%27.0%

13-19FT11-17

68.0%FT%65.0%

32Rebounds32

11Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists13

10Turnovers12

7Steals1

2Blocks4

13Fouls17

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keith Lamar	F	37	7-15	2-4	8-10	5	2	1	0	24
Shannon Grant	Center	26	6-9	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	2	14
Jordan Chatman	G	32	5-12	0-1	3-4	9	0	2	0	13
Jalen Speer	G	32	3-11	0-3	0-1	3	7	0	0	6
K'Jei Parker	G	25	2-4	1-1	0-0	3	2	1	0	5
Roderick Coffee III	F	19	2-4	0-1	0-0	1	2	3	0	4
Matthew Webster	F	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Hantz Louis-Jeune	G	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Chase Barrs	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Hall	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jourdan Smith	Guard	37	7-8	0-1	4-6	4	0	0	2	18
Antwan Burnett	G	37	8-13	1-3	1-2	10	5	1	0	18
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	28	5-10	2-4	1-2	0	3	0	0	13
Kintavious Dozier	G	31	3-10	0-2	1-2	7	2	0	1	7
Jonathan Aku	Forward	12	2-3	0-0	0-1	2	1	0	1	4
Mikale Stevenson	G	12	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Zahad Munford	Guard	9	0-2	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Quintin Murrell	Guard	5	0-1	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

102.1Offensive Efficiency112.6

112.6Defensive Efficiency102.1

-10.5Net Efficiency10.5

47.4%Effective FG%58.2%

50.7%True Shooting %59.5%

15.1%Turnover Rate17.9%

32.8%Free Throw Rate30.9%

19.0%3-Point Rate27.3%

1.30Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Grambling won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.