Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.2%Clemson

34.8%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -3.7

PROJECTED TOTAL143.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -187

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Projected Total143.6

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 70

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricNotre Dame

59.9MMH Power Index49.7

112.6Offensive Efficiency110.3

101.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

11.2Net Efficiency-0.9

4.6Strength of Schedule4.7

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

63.6Tempo68.0

53.0%Effective FG%53.0%

14.0%Turnover Rate17.0%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

38.1%Free Throw Rate34.7%

7.2Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–49.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.3), defensive efficiency (101.4–111.2), net efficiency (11.2–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.7–4.6), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0).

Final

Clemson

62—69

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 7 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATNotre Dame

23-59FG24-57

39.0%FG%42.0%

5-283PT10-28

18.0%3PT%36.0%

11-14FT11-14

79.0%FT%79.0%

35Rebounds35

7Offensive Rebounds5

10Assists11

7Turnovers7

2Steals6

2Blocks—

15Fouls11

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	32	8-19	2-10	3-5	7	0	0	1	21
Chauncey Wiggins	F	32	5-7	1-3	1-2	3	2	0	0	12
Joseph Girard III	Guard	31	3-12	2-8	3-3	2	2	1	0	11
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	5-9	0-1	0-0	14	3	1	0	10
Chase Hunter	Guard	34	1-8	0-3	2-2	3	0	0	1	4
Joshua Beadle	G	16	0-1	0-1	2-2	1	2	0	0	2
Dillon Hunter	G	11	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
RJ Godfrey	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Markus Burton	G	35	8-16	2-6	3-6	6	4	1	21
Tae Davis	F	30	5-7	0-0	8-8	5	1	1	18
Carey Booth	F	23	4-8	3-6	0-0	5	0	1	11
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	33	3-10	2-6	0-0	1	2	0	8
Matt Zona	Forward	28	2-4	2-3	0-0	4	2	0	6
J.R. Konieczny	F	10	2-4	1-2	0-0	1	0	2	5
Logan Imes	G	24	0-4	0-3	0-0	4	1	0	0
Kebba Njie	F	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	0
Julian Roper II	Guard	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

94.4Offensive Efficiency105.0

105.0Defensive Efficiency94.4

-10.7Net Efficiency10.7

43.2%Effective FG%50.9%

47.2%True Shooting %54.2%

10.7%Turnover Rate10.7%

23.7%Free Throw Rate24.6%

47.5%3-Point Rate49.1%

1.43Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.