
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.3%UT Rio Grande Valley
68.7%California Baptist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia Baptist -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL143.0
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia Baptist -219

California Baptist
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 69
Projected Total143.0
Projected ScoreCalifornia Baptist 74
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index58.3
112.6Offensive Efficiency106.5
103.1Defensive Efficiency99.0
9.5Net Efficiency7.5
-1.9Strength of Schedule1.8
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency11.0
67.4Tempo68.2
55.7%Effective FG%48.8%
17.9%Turnover Rate17.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %37.0%
29.6%Free Throw Rate37.0%
6.4Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
EVEN MATCHUP
WIN PROBABILITY68.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
5–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNo clear statistical separation